FSMA 2023 Secondary Competitiveness and Growth Objective:   A Step Back or a Step Forward?

Abstract: The Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) 2023 sparked considerable debates for the imposition of a Secondary International Competitiveness and Growth Objective (SICGO) on the UK’s financial regulators. This article challenges the criticisms of SICGO by first highlighting its implications as (1) a secondary objective, and less noticeably, (2) the qualification for SICGO to be aligned with international standards. To take this further, we compare SICGO horizontally with the competitiveness ‘have regard’ of the abolished Financial Services Authority, and vertically to similar mandates in Singapore and other countries. From this, we formulate recommendations to (A) better communicate SICGO’s limitations externally, and (B) align the organisational and accountability structure to execute SICGO internally. Fundamentally, this paper not only seeks to provide a one-off evaluation of SICGO but also demonstrate fresh methodologies for future regulatory studies by interacting with adjacent fields of research while being firmly anchored in legal analysis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2052-1871.1937
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FSMA 2023 Secondary Competitiveness and Growth Objective:   A Step Back or a Step Forward?

Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

FSMA 2023 Secondary Competitiveness and Growth Objective:   A Step Back or a Step Forward?

article en

Abstract

Abstract: The Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) 2023 sparked considerable debates for the imposition of a Secondary International Competitiveness and Growth Objective (SICGO) on the UK’s financial regulators. This article challenges the criticisms of SICGO by first highlighting its implications as (1) a secondary objective, and less noticeably, (2) the qualification for SICGO to be aligned with international standards. To take this further, we compare SICGO horizontally with the competitiveness ‘have regard’ of the abolished Financial Services Authority, and vertically to similar mandates in Singapore and other countries. From this, we formulate recommendations to (A) better communicate SICGO’s limitations externally, and (B) align the organisational and accountability structure to execute SICGO internally. Fundamentally, this paper not only seeks to provide a one-off evaluation of SICGO but also demonstrate fresh methodologies for future regulatory studies by interacting with adjacent fields of research while being firmly anchored in legal analysis.

Journal of Law and JurisprudenceVol. 13(1)
Alpine Quantum Technologies (Austria) (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.