A multi-objective optimization model for cropland design considering profit, biodiversity, and ecosystem services

• A multi-objective optimization model is proposed to design a cropland. • The model considers tradeoffs between profit, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. • The model includes the effect of edges and core area on biodiversity. • The model is applied to a field to show the benefits of careful cropland design. More sustainable agricultural methods are needed to alleviate the decreases in biodiversity and ecosystem services that have occurred because of industrial agriculture. One such method is the inclusion of alternative crops into croplands that can support biodiversity, reduce erosion and chemical runoff, and sequester carbon in the soil. However, the question of where such crops should be planted to balance competing economic and environmental objectives remains open. To this end, we develop a mixed-integer quadratically constrained program to optimize the layout of a cropland considering economic, biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, and water quality objectives. We include spatially varying fertilization as a decision variable in addition to crop establishment location. We further include the effect of core area and edges between different crops on biodiversity. To demonstrate the applicability of the model, we apply it to an example field, showing how the optimal cropland design changes as a decision-maker prioritizes different objectives and as edges have different impacts on biodiversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Modelling
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110954
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-objective optimization model for cropland design considering profit, biodiversity, and ecosystem services

Caleb H. Geissler, Tyler J. Lark, Nathan L. Haan, Christos T. Maravelias et al.
5 citations
Ecological Modelling
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.41
article

A multi-objective optimization model for cropland design considering profit, biodiversity, and ecosystem services

Caleb H. Geissler, Tyler J. Lark, Nathan L. Haan, Christos T. Maravelias, Ames Fowler, Bruno Basso, Douglas A. Landis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• A multi-objective optimization model is proposed to design a cropland. • The model considers tradeoffs between profit, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. • The model includes the effect of edges and core area on biodiversity. • The model is applied to a field to show the benefits of careful cropland design. More sustainable agricultural methods are needed to alleviate the decreases in biodiversity and ecosystem services that have occurred because of industrial agriculture. One such method is the inclusion of alternative crops into croplands that can support biodiversity, reduce erosion and chemical runoff, and sequester carbon in the soil. However, the question of where such crops should be planted to balance competing economic and environmental objectives remains open. To this end, we develop a mixed-integer quadratically constrained program to optimize the layout of a cropland considering economic, biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, and water quality objectives. We include spatially varying fertilization as a decision variable in addition to crop establishment location. We further include the effect of core area and edges between different crops on biodiversity. To demonstrate the applicability of the model, we apply it to an example field, showing how the optimal cropland design changes as a decision-maker prioritizes different objectives and as edges have different impacts on biodiversity.

Ecological ModellingVol. 500
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Kentucky (US), Princeton University (US), Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (US), Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery (US), Michigan State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.