Can quantum computers do nothing?

Quantum computing platforms are subject to contradictory engineering requirements: qubits must be protected from mutual interactions when idling ('doing nothing'), and strongly interacting when in operation. If idling qubits are not sufficiently protected, information 'leaks' into neighbouring qubits, becoming ultimately inaccessible. Candidate solutions to this dilemma include many-body localization, dynamical decoupling, and active error correction. However, no protocol exists to quantify this effect in a similar way to e.g. SPAM errors. We develop a scalable, device non-specific, protocol for quantifying idle information loss by exploiting tools from quantum information theory. We implement this protocol in over 3500 experiments carried out across 4 months (Dec 2023-Mar 2024) on IBM's entire Falcon 5.11 processor series. After accounting for other error sources, we detect information loss to high degrees of statistical significance. This work thus provides a firm quantitative foundation from which the protection-operation dilemma can be investigated and ultimately resolved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Quantum Information
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00918-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can quantum computers do nothing?

John Goold, Nathan Keenan, Alexander Nico-Katz
4 citations
npj Quantum Information
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
1.39
article

Can quantum computers do nothing?

John Goold, Nathan Keenan, Alexander Nico-Katz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Quantum computing platforms are subject to contradictory engineering requirements: qubits must be protected from mutual interactions when idling ('doing nothing'), and strongly interacting when in operation. If idling qubits are not sufficiently protected, information 'leaks' into neighbouring qubits, becoming ultimately inaccessible. Candidate solutions to this dilemma include many-body localization, dynamical decoupling, and active error correction. However, no protocol exists to quantify this effect in a similar way to e.g. SPAM errors. We develop a scalable, device non-specific, protocol for quantifying idle information loss by exploiting tools from quantum information theory. We implement this protocol in over 3500 experiments carried out across 4 months (Dec 2023-Mar 2024) on IBM's entire Falcon 5.11 processor series. After accounting for other error sources, we detect information loss to high degrees of statistical significance. This work thus provides a firm quantitative foundation from which the protection-operation dilemma can be investigated and ultimately resolved.

npj Quantum InformationVol. 10(1)
Trinity College Dublin (IE), IBM Research - Ireland (IE), Finnish Transport Agency (FI)
Science Foundation Ireland
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can quantum computers do nothing? — John Goold, Nathan Keenan, et al. · npj Quantum Information (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS