Analgesic effects of high-frequency rTMS on pain anticipation and perception

Previous studies suggest that pain perception is greatly shaped by anticipation, with M1 and DLPFC involved in this process. We hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS targeting these regions could alter pain anticipation and thereby reduce pain perception. In a double-blind, sham-controlled study, healthy participants received 10 Hz rTMS to M1, DLPFC, or a sham treatment. Assessments were conducted before, immediately after, and 60 min after stimulation, including laser-evoked potentials, pain ratings, and anticipatory EEG. M1-rTMS immediately reduced laser-evoked P2 amplitude, increased sensorimotor high-frequency α-oscillation power, and accelerated peak alpha frequency in the midfrontal region during pain anticipation. In contrast, DLPFC-rTMS reduced the N2-P2 complex and pain ratings 60 min post-stimulation, an effect associated with prolonged microstate C duration during pain anticipation-a microstate linked to default mode network activity. Thus, M1-rTMS immediately modulates anticipatory α-oscillations and laser-evoked potentials, while DLPFC-rTMS induces delayed analgesic effects partially by modulating default mode network activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07129-x
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analgesic effects of high-frequency rTMS on pain anticipation and perception

Yuzhen Hu, Richu Jin, Wutao Lou, Zhouan Liu et al.
8 citations
Communications Biology
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
2.61
article

Analgesic effects of high-frequency rTMS on pain anticipation and perception

Yuzhen Hu, Richu Jin, Wutao Lou, Zhouan Liu, Weiwei Peng, Xiaoyun Li
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that pain perception is greatly shaped by anticipation, with M1 and DLPFC involved in this process. We hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS targeting these regions could alter pain anticipation and thereby reduce pain perception. In a double-blind, sham-controlled study, healthy participants received 10 Hz rTMS to M1, DLPFC, or a sham treatment. Assessments were conducted before, immediately after, and 60 min after stimulation, including laser-evoked potentials, pain ratings, and anticipatory EEG. M1-rTMS immediately reduced laser-evoked P2 amplitude, increased sensorimotor high-frequency α-oscillation power, and accelerated peak alpha frequency in the midfrontal region during pain anticipation. In contrast, DLPFC-rTMS reduced the N2-P2 complex and pain ratings 60 min post-stimulation, an effect associated with prolonged microstate C duration during pain anticipation-a microstate linked to default mode network activity. Thus, M1-rTMS immediately modulates anticipatory α-oscillations and laser-evoked potentials, while DLPFC-rTMS induces delayed analgesic effects partially by modulating default mode network activity.

Communications BiologyVol. 7(1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Shenzhen University (CN), Shenzhen Polytechnic University (CN), Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.