Restoration of forestry-drained boreal peatland ecosystems can effectively stop and reverse ecosystem degradation

Ecosystem restoration will increase following the ambitious international targets, which calls for a rigorous evaluation of restoration effectiveness. Here, we present results from a long-term before-after control-impact experiment on the restoration of forestry-drained boreal peatland ecosystems. Our data comprise 151 sites, representing six ecosystem types. Species-level vegetation sampling has been conducted before, two, five, and ten years after restoration. With joint species distribution modelling, we show that, on average, not restoring leads to further degradation, but restoration stops and reverses this trend. The variation in restoration outcomes largely arises from ecosystem types: restoration of nutrient-poor ecosystems has a higher probability of failure. Yet, the ten-year study period is insufficient to capture the restoration effects in slow-recovering ecosystems. Altogether, restoration can effectively halt the biodiversity loss of degraded ecosystems, although ecosystem attributes affect the outcome. This variability in outcomes underlies the need for evidence-based prioritization of restoration efforts across ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01844-3
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoration of forestry-drained boreal peatland ecosystems can effectively stop and reverse ecosystem degradation

Santtu Kareksela, Otso Ovaskainen, Nerea Abrego, Kaisu Aapala et al.
20 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
9.18
article

Restoration of forestry-drained boreal peatland ecosystems can effectively stop and reverse ecosystem degradation

Santtu Kareksela, Otso Ovaskainen, Nerea Abrego, Kaisu Aapala, Janne S. Kotiaho, Merja Elo, Jenni Niku, Sara Taskinen
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Ecosystem restoration will increase following the ambitious international targets, which calls for a rigorous evaluation of restoration effectiveness. Here, we present results from a long-term before-after control-impact experiment on the restoration of forestry-drained boreal peatland ecosystems. Our data comprise 151 sites, representing six ecosystem types. Species-level vegetation sampling has been conducted before, two, five, and ten years after restoration. With joint species distribution modelling, we show that, on average, not restoring leads to further degradation, but restoration stops and reverses this trend. The variation in restoration outcomes largely arises from ecosystem types: restoration of nutrient-poor ecosystems has a higher probability of failure. Yet, the ten-year study period is insufficient to capture the restoration effects in slow-recovering ecosystems. Altogether, restoration can effectively halt the biodiversity loss of degraded ecosystems, although ecosystem attributes affect the outcome. This variability in outcomes underlies the need for evidence-based prioritization of restoration efforts across ecosystems.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 5(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Metsähallitus (Finland) (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
9.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.