Comparing the effects of blended learning and traditional instruction on “Medical Genetics and Embryonic Development” in undergraduate medical students: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Objectives The Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine is at the forefront of educational innovation to enhance student learning outcomes. Herein, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning compared to traditional on-site instruction in the “Medical Genetics and Embryonic Development” curriculum. Methods A randomized trial was conducted involving 338 second-year clinical medicine students during the 2023–2024 academic year. The students were divided into two groups: one received blended learning and the other, on-site instruction. Students’ performance was evaluated using ongoing assessments together with mid-term and final exams. Results Blended learning led to higher overall final grades, with no significant difference in quiz performance, but better exam scores compared to traditional learning. At the level of higher-order learning skills, students in the blended learning group performed better in karyotyping. However, the traditional on-site group slightly outperformed the blended learning group in case-based learning scores. Ultimately, approximately 92 % of students were satisfied with the blended learning course. Conclusions Blended learning does show promise in improving the self-learning skill and overall learning outcomes of medical students. Future studies should focus on optimizing blended learning strategies and assessing their long-term impacts on clinical competencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Medical Education
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/gme-2024-0014
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the effects of blended learning and traditional instruction on “Medical Genetics and Embryonic Development” in undergraduate medical students: a randomized controlled trial

Yan Chen, Yan Xue, Ying-yin Ni, Bing Liao et al.
Global Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Comparing the effects of blended learning and traditional instruction on “Medical Genetics and Embryonic Development” in undergraduate medical students: a randomized controlled trial

Yan Chen, Yan Xue, Ying-yin Ni, Bing Liao, Lei Huang, Yujie Tang, Xiaoyu Xia, Hui Li, Jingwen Wu, Shuangyu Ma, Suying Dang, Ming-min Gu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine is at the forefront of educational innovation to enhance student learning outcomes. Herein, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning compared to traditional on-site instruction in the “Medical Genetics and Embryonic Development” curriculum. Methods A randomized trial was conducted involving 338 second-year clinical medicine students during the 2023–2024 academic year. The students were divided into two groups: one received blended learning and the other, on-site instruction. Students’ performance was evaluated using ongoing assessments together with mid-term and final exams. Results Blended learning led to higher overall final grades, with no significant difference in quiz performance, but better exam scores compared to traditional learning. At the level of higher-order learning skills, students in the blended learning group performed better in karyotyping. However, the traditional on-site group slightly outperformed the blended learning group in case-based learning scores. Ultimately, approximately 92 % of students were satisfied with the blended learning course. Conclusions Blended learning does show promise in improving the self-learning skill and overall learning outcomes of medical students. Future studies should focus on optimizing blended learning strategies and assessing their long-term impacts on clinical competencies.

Global Medical EducationVol. 1(1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.