The Impact of Public Policy on Equitable Access to Technology for Children and Youth Living with Type 1 Diabetes in British Columbia, Canada

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Structural inequities impede technology uptake in marginalized populations living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Our objective was to describe hemoglobin A1c (HbA<sub>1c</sub>), time in range (TIR), and pump use to evaluate the impact of a universal funding policy for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) across levels of deprivation in children with T1D in the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with T1D and at least one outpatient visit after June 10, 2020 (1-year before universal CGM funding) who were enrolled in the BC Pediatric Diabetes Registry were included (<i>n</i> = 477). The Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (quintile 1 = least deprived; quintile 5 = most deprived) was determined using postal code. Mixed effects models were used to describe HbA<sub>1c</sub>, TIR, and pump use, and an interrupted time series generalized additive model estimated the change in CGM use pre- and postintroduction of universal coverage. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No differences were observed among the five levels of deprivation for HbA<sub>1c</sub> and TIR; however, for residential instability, those with the highest level of deprivation had a lower probability of pump use (-18.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -26.1% to -11.7% for quintile 5 vs. 1). There was an increase in CGM uptake across all levels of deprivation 1-year after introduction of universal CGM funding. For example, the difference in sensor use from the most to least deprived situational group was -21.0% (-35.4%, -6.6%) at the time of universal coverage and shrank to -4.6% (-21.6%, 12.4%) after 12 months of coverage. However, an equity gap in CGM use persisted between the least and most deprived groups (-21.9, 95% CI = -34.5 to -9.4 for quintile 5 vs. 1 in economic dependency). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Universal coverage of CGM improved uptake; however, equity gaps persisted. More research is needed to explore nonfinancial barriers to diabetes technology use in marginalized populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0366
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Public Policy on Equitable Access to Technology for Children and Youth Living with Type 1 Diabetes in British Columbia, Canada

Ananta Addala, Shazhan Amed, Jeffrey N. Bone, Courtney Leach
2 citations
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes Management and Research
0.72
article

The Impact of Public Policy on Equitable Access to Technology for Children and Youth Living with Type 1 Diabetes in British Columbia, Canada

Ananta Addala, Shazhan Amed, Jeffrey N. Bone, Courtney Leach
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Structural inequities impede technology uptake in marginalized populations living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Our objective was to describe hemoglobin A1c (HbA<sub>1c</sub>), time in range (TIR), and pump use to evaluate the impact of a universal funding policy for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) across levels of deprivation in children with T1D in the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with T1D and at least one outpatient visit after June 10, 2020 (1-year before universal CGM funding) who were enrolled in the BC Pediatric Diabetes Registry were included (<i>n</i> = 477). The Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (quintile 1 = least deprived; quintile 5 = most deprived) was determined using postal code. Mixed effects models were used to describe HbA<sub>1c</sub>, TIR, and pump use, and an interrupted time series generalized additive model estimated the change in CGM use pre- and postintroduction of universal coverage. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No differences were observed among the five levels of deprivation for HbA<sub>1c</sub> and TIR; however, for residential instability, those with the highest level of deprivation had a lower probability of pump use (-18.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -26.1% to -11.7% for quintile 5 vs. 1). There was an increase in CGM uptake across all levels of deprivation 1-year after introduction of universal CGM funding. For example, the difference in sensor use from the most to least deprived situational group was -21.0% (-35.4%, -6.6%) at the time of universal coverage and shrank to -4.6% (-21.6%, 12.4%) after 12 months of coverage. However, an equity gap in CGM use persisted between the least and most deprived groups (-21.9, 95% CI = -34.5 to -9.4 for quintile 5 vs. 1 in economic dependency). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Universal coverage of CGM improved uptake; however, equity gaps persisted. More research is needed to explore nonfinancial barriers to diabetes technology use in marginalized populations.

Diabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 27(3)
University of British Columbia (CA), BC Children's Hospital (CA), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Diabetes Management and Research
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.