The drivers of liquidity risk in the GCC dual banking sector: the impact of the bank’s business model

Purpose Considering the influence of the bank’s business model, this study aims to explore the drivers of liquidity risk in the dual banking sector of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) using the two new liquidity requirements of Basel III, Net Stable Funding Ratio and Liquidity Coverage Ratio, as indicators of liquidity risk. Design/methodology/approach For 61 GCC banks between 2018 and 2022, this study applies the random effects model with an interaction dummy variable technique. Findings Islamic banks in the GCC region tend to have a significantly lower level of Basel III liquidity requirements, meaning that they are struggling to meet the new Basel III liquidity requirements as they lack an adequate liquidity risk management framework. The liquidity of GCC banks decreases with size; this relationship is linear for conventional GCC banks but not linear for Islamic banks. Finally, the COVID-19 epidemic has exacerbated liquidity risk for GCC banks, with Islamic banks appearing to be the most impacted. The findings are robust to alternative variable selections and estimation techniques. Practical implications The findings provide useful insights to improve liquidity risk management practices in the GCC banking system, especially for Islamic banks. Targeted reforms may be needed to further develop Islamic banks’ liquidity tools and optimize their ability to withstand macroeconomic and systemic shocks. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, no single study considers the new Basel III metrics for bank liquidity or explicitly compares a wide range of liquidity factors for conventional and Islamic banks in the GCC region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-01-2024-0020
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The drivers of liquidity risk in the GCC dual banking sector: the impact of the bank’s business model

Mohammad Alsharif
3 citations
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
1.62
article

The drivers of liquidity risk in the GCC dual banking sector: the impact of the bank’s business model

Mohammad Alsharif
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose Considering the influence of the bank’s business model, this study aims to explore the drivers of liquidity risk in the dual banking sector of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) using the two new liquidity requirements of Basel III, Net Stable Funding Ratio and Liquidity Coverage Ratio, as indicators of liquidity risk. Design/methodology/approach For 61 GCC banks between 2018 and 2022, this study applies the random effects model with an interaction dummy variable technique. Findings Islamic banks in the GCC region tend to have a significantly lower level of Basel III liquidity requirements, meaning that they are struggling to meet the new Basel III liquidity requirements as they lack an adequate liquidity risk management framework. The liquidity of GCC banks decreases with size; this relationship is linear for conventional GCC banks but not linear for Islamic banks. Finally, the COVID-19 epidemic has exacerbated liquidity risk for GCC banks, with Islamic banks appearing to be the most impacted. The findings are robust to alternative variable selections and estimation techniques. Practical implications The findings provide useful insights to improve liquidity risk management practices in the GCC banking system, especially for Islamic banks. Targeted reforms may be needed to further develop Islamic banks’ liquidity tools and optimize their ability to withstand macroeconomic and systemic shocks. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, no single study considers the new Basel III metrics for bank liquidity or explicitly compares a wide range of liquidity factors for conventional and Islamic banks in the GCC region.

International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and ManagementVol. 18(2)
Taibah University (SA), University of Business and Technology (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.