Rigorous and always from the heart: what personas did in the process of designing a youth care facility

Architects use scenario-based design (SBD) to design for diversity, employing instruments like personas and scenarios. The development and use of personas has been subject to debate; these instruments are critiqued for missing either rigour or heart. We contribute to this debate through a reflective case-study on what personas did in the process of designing a care facility. We examine a yearlong collaboration between architectural researchers and a youth care organization. Next to our own perspective as researchers, the analysis considers that of the endusers (children/youth and staff), the client and the architects. Our exploration of different perspectives shows that personas – their aspects and situations – must be recognizable beyond mere representation. While initially influential, the personas seemed less capable of steering design propositions beyond current use. Insight into how these instruments (and SBD in general) affect stakeholders’ involvement and the design process can shift discussions about rigour and heart, balancing what is important in development and usage. Rigour and heart, in this context, do not exclude one another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CoDesign
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2024.2427014
Primary Topic
Persona Design and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rigorous and always from the heart: what personas did in the process of designing a youth care facility

Pleuntje Jellema, Ann Heylighen, Piet Tutenel
CoDesign
Persona Design and Applications
article

Rigorous and always from the heart: what personas did in the process of designing a youth care facility

Pleuntje Jellema, Ann Heylighen, Piet Tutenel
article en

Abstract

Architects use scenario-based design (SBD) to design for diversity, employing instruments like personas and scenarios. The development and use of personas has been subject to debate; these instruments are critiqued for missing either rigour or heart. We contribute to this debate through a reflective case-study on what personas did in the process of designing a care facility. We examine a yearlong collaboration between architectural researchers and a youth care organization. Next to our own perspective as researchers, the analysis considers that of the endusers (children/youth and staff), the client and the architects. Our exploration of different perspectives shows that personas – their aspects and situations – must be recognizable beyond mere representation. While initially influential, the personas seemed less capable of steering design propositions beyond current use. Insight into how these instruments (and SBD in general) affect stakeholders’ involvement and the design process can shift discussions about rigour and heart, balancing what is important in development and usage. Rigour and heart, in this context, do not exclude one another.

CoDesignVol. 21(4)
Faculty of Design (SI), KU Leuven (BE)
KU Leuven
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Persona Design and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.