Comparison and mathematical modeling of surge avoidance methods in turbojet engine compressor

The sudden surge phenomenon in an axial compressor represents one of the most critical issues that can confront a turbojet engine.This phenomenon primarily arises from the engine ingesting hot exhaust gases from weaponry systems, particularly in military aircraft, potentially leading to engine failure.This study delves into the impact of hot gas ingestion on compressor stability and compares a range of effective methods to prevent surge in such cases which are: (1) air bleed from the compressor, (2) fuel cut-off, (3) gas cooling through water injection at the air inlet.The R29-300 twin-spool turbojet engine was chosen for computational experiments due to the availability of the necessary digital information for mathematical modelling of this engine.It is a two-shaft turbojet engine consisting of a low-pressure compressor (5 stages), a high-pressure compressor (6 stages), an annular combustion chamber, a high-pressure turbine (two stages), and a low-pressure turbine (one stage).The results showed that introducing gases with a heating rate of up to 5000 Kelvin per second causes the low-pressure compressor to exit its stable operating regime and the engine to stall.The effect on the high-pressure compressor was minimal and did not exceed the stability limits, therefore the focus of the procedures was on the low-pressure compressor.The results also showed that both methods 1 and 2 are effective in preventing surge within an acceptable stability range, but they have several drawbacks, including a decrease in engine thrust and efficiency.On the other hand, the water injection method eliminates the root cause of surge by cooling the incoming gases and maintains engine stability.The amount of water required for this process is relatively small and can be carried on aircraft without a significant impact on weight and volume.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/195236
Primary Topic
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and mathematical modeling of surge avoidance methods in turbojet engine compressor

Firas Lattef Hussany, Nabeel N. Al-Mayyahi, Ali Jasim Mohammed
Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
article

Comparison and mathematical modeling of surge avoidance methods in turbojet engine compressor

Firas Lattef Hussany, Nabeel N. Al-Mayyahi, Ali Jasim Mohammed
article en

Abstract

The sudden surge phenomenon in an axial compressor represents one of the most critical issues that can confront a turbojet engine.This phenomenon primarily arises from the engine ingesting hot exhaust gases from weaponry systems, particularly in military aircraft, potentially leading to engine failure.This study delves into the impact of hot gas ingestion on compressor stability and compares a range of effective methods to prevent surge in such cases which are: (1) air bleed from the compressor, (2) fuel cut-off, (3) gas cooling through water injection at the air inlet.The R29-300 twin-spool turbojet engine was chosen for computational experiments due to the availability of the necessary digital information for mathematical modelling of this engine.It is a two-shaft turbojet engine consisting of a low-pressure compressor (5 stages), a high-pressure compressor (6 stages), an annular combustion chamber, a high-pressure turbine (two stages), and a low-pressure turbine (one stage).The results showed that introducing gases with a heating rate of up to 5000 Kelvin per second causes the low-pressure compressor to exit its stable operating regime and the engine to stall.The effect on the high-pressure compressor was minimal and did not exceed the stability limits, therefore the focus of the procedures was on the low-pressure compressor.The results also showed that both methods 1 and 2 are effective in preventing surge within an acceptable stability range, but they have several drawbacks, including a decrease in engine thrust and efficiency.On the other hand, the water injection method eliminates the root cause of surge by cooling the incoming gases and maintains engine stability.The amount of water required for this process is relatively small and can be carried on aircraft without a significant impact on weight and volume.

Advances in Science and Technology – Research JournalVol. 19(1)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.