On the influence of gadgets on family relationships

The author of the article reflects on the problems of using of gadgets in the modern world. The development of information technology affects all spheres of people's lives, including changes in marital and child-parent relationships. The article examines modern literature and conducts a secondary analysis of research data from the Public Opinion Foundation (FOM), the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion (VTsIOM), etc., concerning the positive and negative aspects of the influence of digital technologies on family interaction. Attention is paid to the peculiarities of network behavior, online communication of parents and children, in particular to such problems as: gadget addiction (gadget addiction), i.e. uncontrolled use of gadgets; phubbing – the habit of immersing yourself in a gadget while talking with an offline interlocutor, etc. Gadgets become members of the family, “living creatures”, part of a family environment. Parents, on the one hand, try to control the gadget-child relationship, on the other hand, they themselves are immersed in gadgets, and also use them as a means of reward/punishment, thereby only increasing the value of the device in the eyes of the child. Being one of the most important attributes of the life of a modern person, gadgets are distinguished by functionality, mobility and almost continuous access to the Internet. They allow you to overcome the limitations of real contacts, uniting people living far from each other, helping to maintain contact with loved ones at a distance, combining work and raising children, gaining new knowledge, and shopping without leaving home. It would be wrong to assess the impact of gadgets on everyday practices, including family practices, on a “positive-negative” scale. “Gadgetization” is a complex process that requires close study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Moscow State University Bulletin Series 18 Sociology and Political Science
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2024-30-3-212-230
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the influence of gadgets on family relationships

E. N. Novoselova
Moscow State University Bulletin Series 18 Sociology and Political Science
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

On the influence of gadgets on family relationships

E. N. Novoselova
article en

Abstract

The author of the article reflects on the problems of using of gadgets in the modern world. The development of information technology affects all spheres of people's lives, including changes in marital and child-parent relationships. The article examines modern literature and conducts a secondary analysis of research data from the Public Opinion Foundation (FOM), the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion (VTsIOM), etc., concerning the positive and negative aspects of the influence of digital technologies on family interaction. Attention is paid to the peculiarities of network behavior, online communication of parents and children, in particular to such problems as: gadget addiction (gadget addiction), i.e. uncontrolled use of gadgets; phubbing – the habit of immersing yourself in a gadget while talking with an offline interlocutor, etc. Gadgets become members of the family, “living creatures”, part of a family environment. Parents, on the one hand, try to control the gadget-child relationship, on the other hand, they themselves are immersed in gadgets, and also use them as a means of reward/punishment, thereby only increasing the value of the device in the eyes of the child. Being one of the most important attributes of the life of a modern person, gadgets are distinguished by functionality, mobility and almost continuous access to the Internet. They allow you to overcome the limitations of real contacts, uniting people living far from each other, helping to maintain contact with loved ones at a distance, combining work and raising children, gaining new knowledge, and shopping without leaving home. It would be wrong to assess the impact of gadgets on everyday practices, including family practices, on a “positive-negative” scale. “Gadgetization” is a complex process that requires close study.

Moscow State University Bulletin Series 18 Sociology and Political ScienceVol. 30(3)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.