Is multichannel retail marketing integration a panacea?

Channel integration/centralization understood as joint pricing of multiple channels is touted as the ideal organization to maximize the profitability of multichannel retailers. This study challenges this claim and analytically examines with two two-period models whether multichannel retailers should centralize or decentralize online and offline pricing decisions when vertical channel interactions and consumer reference price effects are considered. We found that under certain conditions (which depend on several factors, including the manufacturer’s advertising strategies over the two periods, the intensity of price competition between channels, and the consumers’ sensitivity to price changes over time), the retailer may find it optimal to centralize or decentralize online and offline pricing decisions. Therefore, our findings support the idea that multichannel retailing integration is not a panacea, especially in a context where complex vertical interactions with manufacturers are taken into account and where consumers compare current market prices to recent past prices at the time of purchase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2024.2430337
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is multichannel retail marketing integration a panacea?

Guiomar Martín‐Herrán, Simon Pierre Sigué
2 citations
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
0.88
article

Is multichannel retail marketing integration a panacea?

Guiomar Martín‐Herrán, Simon Pierre Sigué
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Channel integration/centralization understood as joint pricing of multiple channels is touted as the ideal organization to maximize the profitability of multichannel retailers. This study challenges this claim and analytically examines with two two-period models whether multichannel retailers should centralize or decentralize online and offline pricing decisions when vertical channel interactions and consumer reference price effects are considered. We found that under certain conditions (which depend on several factors, including the manufacturer’s advertising strategies over the two periods, the intensity of price competition between channels, and the consumers’ sensitivity to price changes over time), the retailer may find it optimal to centralize or decentralize online and offline pricing decisions. Therefore, our findings support the idea that multichannel retailing integration is not a panacea, especially in a context where complex vertical interactions with manufacturers are taken into account and where consumers compare current market prices to recent past prices at the time of purchase.

Journal of the Operational Research SocietyVol. 76(8)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Athabasca University (CA)
Junta de Castilla y León, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
0.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is multichannel retail marketing integration a panacea? — Guiomar Martín‐Herrán, Simon Pierre Sigué · Journal of the Operational Research Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS