BOP2-TE: Bayesian optimal phase 2 design for jointly monitoring efficacy and toxicity with application to dose optimization
We propose a Bayesian optimal phase 2 design for jointly monitoring efficacy and toxicity, referred to as BOP2-TE, to improve the operating characteristics of the BOP2 design proposed by Zhou. BOP2-TE utilizes a Dirichlet-multinomial model to jointly model the distribution of toxicity and efficacy endpoints, making go/no-go decisions based on the posterior probability of toxicity and futility. In comparison to the original BOP2 and other existing designs, BOP2-TE offers the advantage of providing rigorous type I error control in cases where the treatment is toxic and futile, effective but toxic, or safe but futile, while optimizing power when the treatment is effective and safe. As a result, BOP2-TE enhances trial safety and efficacy. We also explore the incorporation of BOP2-TE into multiple-dose randomized trials for dose optimization, and consider a seamless design that integrates phase I dose finding with phase II randomized dose optimization. BOP2-TE is user-friendly, as its decision boundary can be determined prior to the trial's onset. Simulations demonstrate that BOP2-TE possesses desirable operating characteristics. We have developed a user-friendly web application as part of the BOP2 app, which is freely available at https://www.trialdesign.org.
Authors
- Ying Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3163-480X)
- J. Jack Lee
- Heng Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-028X)
- Kai Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8647-1182)
Institutions
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Decision Sciences (United States) (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Published
- 2024-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2429481
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.67
Funders
- National Cancer Institute