Comparing the effectiveness of different <scp>DNA</scp> extraction methods in <scp>MX</scp> ‐80 bentonite

Approaches to DNA extraction play a crucial role in determining the variability of results obtained through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Particularly, clay-rich samples can impede the efficiency of various standard cultivation-independent techniques. We conducted an inter-laboratory comparison study to thoroughly assess the efficacy of two published DNA extraction methods (kit-based and phenol-chloroform-based) specifically designed for bentonite samples. To this end, we spiked Wyoming MX 80 bentonite with two different mock communities and compared the obtained DNA yield and purity, the presence of contaminants and the community profile. Our findings suggest that both methods are equally viable, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of the downstream analysis. However, it is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen method, as comparing results becomes challenging, particularly in the presence of bentonite. In summary, our study emphasizes the significance of standardized DNA extraction methods and underscores the importance of validating these methods using appropriate controls when studying microbial communities with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, particularly in environments characterized by low biomass and clay-rich compositions. Additionally, slight modifications to one of the extraction methods can substantially enhance its efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.70047
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the effectiveness of different DNA extraction methods in MX ‐80 bentonite

Kateřina Černá, Carla Smolders, Cristina Povedano‐Priego, Thanh Duc et al.
3 citations
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
1.38
article

Comparing the effectiveness of different DNA extraction methods in MX ‐80 bentonite

Kateřina Černá, Carla Smolders, Cristina Povedano‐Priego, Thanh Duc, Mohamed L. Merroun, Mar Morales‐Hidalgo, Fadwa Jroundi, Kristel Mijnendonckx, Natalie Leys, Deepa Bartak
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Approaches to DNA extraction play a crucial role in determining the variability of results obtained through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Particularly, clay-rich samples can impede the efficiency of various standard cultivation-independent techniques. We conducted an inter-laboratory comparison study to thoroughly assess the efficacy of two published DNA extraction methods (kit-based and phenol-chloroform-based) specifically designed for bentonite samples. To this end, we spiked Wyoming MX 80 bentonite with two different mock communities and compared the obtained DNA yield and purity, the presence of contaminants and the community profile. Our findings suggest that both methods are equally viable, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of the downstream analysis. However, it is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen method, as comparing results becomes challenging, particularly in the presence of bentonite. In summary, our study emphasizes the significance of standardized DNA extraction methods and underscores the importance of validating these methods using appropriate controls when studying microbial communities with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, particularly in environments characterized by low biomass and clay-rich compositions. Additionally, slight modifications to one of the extraction methods can substantially enhance its efficiency.

Environmental Microbiology ReportsVol. 16(6)
Technical University of Liberec (CZ), Universidad de Granada (ES), Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.