The Tip of the Iceberg, But What's Underneath?: Hidden Shared Governance in the Community College

ABSTRACT This article proposes a new way of thinking about shared governance, focusing on the informal and sometimes unintentional interactions among faculty, staff, and even students. We argue that an operational place to start reconceptualizing shared governance is to look at the everyday interactions that collectively make up the hidden experiences of shared governance, or what we also refer to as the “base” rather than the “tip” of an iceberg. As such, shared governance can be viewed as a socially constructed concept that requires new and different thinking about how decisions are made and how a college's culture makes, and accepts decisions. We conclude with several recommendations for practice which collectively stress reconsidering what shared governance means on an individual campus and how it contributes to strategically thinking and articulately how shared involvement can play an important role in determining the future of a college.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Community Colleges
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20655
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Tip of the Iceberg, But What's Underneath?: Hidden Shared Governance in the Community College

Susan T. Kater, Michael T. Miller
New Directions for Community Colleges
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

The Tip of the Iceberg, But What's Underneath?: Hidden Shared Governance in the Community College

Susan T. Kater, Michael T. Miller
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article proposes a new way of thinking about shared governance, focusing on the informal and sometimes unintentional interactions among faculty, staff, and even students. We argue that an operational place to start reconceptualizing shared governance is to look at the everyday interactions that collectively make up the hidden experiences of shared governance, or what we also refer to as the “base” rather than the “tip” of an iceberg. As such, shared governance can be viewed as a socially constructed concept that requires new and different thinking about how decisions are made and how a college's culture makes, and accepts decisions. We conclude with several recommendations for practice which collectively stress reconsidering what shared governance means on an individual campus and how it contributes to strategically thinking and articulately how shared involvement can play an important role in determining the future of a college.

New Directions for Community CollegesVol. 2024(208)
Idaho State University (US), University of Memphis (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.