Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire Evaluating Medical Students’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Antibiotic Education and Antimicrobial Resistance in University Training

The misuse and overuse of antibiotics represent a critical global issue and one of the most pressing public health challenges of the 21st century. Training future healthcare professionals effectively is essential for ensuring responsible antibiotic use. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire designed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of medical students regarding the education they receive on infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and antibiotic stewardship during their university studies. <b>Methods</b>: A self-administered questionnaire was developed and distributed to medical students at the University of Santiago de Compostela. Comprising 44 items, the questionnaire assessed eight key dimensions: "infection diagnosis", "criteria for not prescribing antibiotics", "initial antibiotic therapy", "re-evaluation of therapy", "quality of care", "communication skills", "antibiotic resistance", and "teaching methodology". Validation was carried out in two stages: Phase 1 involved content and face validity, while Phase 2 focused on reliability analysis. <b>Results</b>: A total of 295 students completed the questionnaire, with a mean age of 23.15 ± 1.78 years. The sample included 86 male (29.2%) and 209 female (70.8%) respondents. Content and face validity were established by a nominal group of five experts and a focus group of medicine and pharmacy students to ensure consensus on item understanding in the Spanish language. The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 and satisfactory item discrimination. Construct validity was confirmed through principal component analysis, which supported the presence of the eight predefined dimensions. <b>Conclusions</b>: The validated questionnaire exhibited strong reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing medical students' training in antibiotic-related topics. Its application will enable the identification of areas for improvement in university curricula, ultimately contributing to the promotion of appropriate antibiotic use and the reduction of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121126
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire Evaluating Medical Students’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Antibiotic Education and Antimicrobial Resistance in University Training

Olalla Vázquez-Cancela, Juan Manuel Vázquez-Lago, Marta Mascareñas‐García, Guillermo Lens-Perol et al.
2 citations
Antibiotics
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
0.60
article

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire Evaluating Medical Students’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Antibiotic Education and Antimicrobial Resistance in University Training

Olalla Vázquez-Cancela, Juan Manuel Vázquez-Lago, Marta Mascareñas‐García, Guillermo Lens-Perol, Magdalena Santana-Armas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The misuse and overuse of antibiotics represent a critical global issue and one of the most pressing public health challenges of the 21st century. Training future healthcare professionals effectively is essential for ensuring responsible antibiotic use. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire designed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of medical students regarding the education they receive on infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and antibiotic stewardship during their university studies. <b>Methods</b>: A self-administered questionnaire was developed and distributed to medical students at the University of Santiago de Compostela. Comprising 44 items, the questionnaire assessed eight key dimensions: "infection diagnosis", "criteria for not prescribing antibiotics", "initial antibiotic therapy", "re-evaluation of therapy", "quality of care", "communication skills", "antibiotic resistance", and "teaching methodology". Validation was carried out in two stages: Phase 1 involved content and face validity, while Phase 2 focused on reliability analysis. <b>Results</b>: A total of 295 students completed the questionnaire, with a mean age of 23.15 ± 1.78 years. The sample included 86 male (29.2%) and 209 female (70.8%) respondents. Content and face validity were established by a nominal group of five experts and a focus group of medicine and pharmacy students to ensure consensus on item understanding in the Spanish language. The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 and satisfactory item discrimination. Construct validity was confirmed through principal component analysis, which supported the presence of the eight predefined dimensions. <b>Conclusions</b>: The validated questionnaire exhibited strong reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing medical students' training in antibiotic-related topics. Its application will enable the identification of areas for improvement in university curricula, ultimately contributing to the promotion of appropriate antibiotic use and the reduction of antimicrobial resistance.

AntibioticsVol. 13(12)
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.