Electronic vs optical bandgap of stoichiometric V2O5: Effects of surface transfer doping and electron accumulation layer

The experimental and theoretical bandgap reported for stoichiometric V2O5, a layered semiconductor of great technological importance, spans a wide range of 1.7–4.8 eV. Using combined photoemission, absorption, and photoluminescence measurements, we show that the fundamental electronic gap of V2O5 is 1.85 eV, which is in close agreement with the value of 1.8 eV predicted by the first density functional theory studies, but is lower than the value of 2.2–2.8 eV obtained from optical absorption and photoemission studies. It is shown that this difference between the fundamental and optical gaps is due to the presence of a surface electron accumulation layer, which results in a Burstein–Moss shift of the Fermi level well into the conduction band. The underlying cause of degenerate electron doping is due to “surface transfer doping” by ambient water molecules as a result of the high electron affinity of the semiconductor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0233493
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electronic vs optical bandgap of stoichiometric V2O5: Effects of surface transfer doping and electron accumulation layer

Sang Yeon Lee, Vidhya Chakrapani, Qi Wang
12 citations
Journal of Applied Physics
Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
2.02
article

Electronic vs optical bandgap of stoichiometric V2O5: Effects of surface transfer doping and electron accumulation layer

Sang Yeon Lee, Vidhya Chakrapani, Qi Wang
article en
12 citations

Abstract

The experimental and theoretical bandgap reported for stoichiometric V2O5, a layered semiconductor of great technological importance, spans a wide range of 1.7–4.8 eV. Using combined photoemission, absorption, and photoluminescence measurements, we show that the fundamental electronic gap of V2O5 is 1.85 eV, which is in close agreement with the value of 1.8 eV predicted by the first density functional theory studies, but is lower than the value of 2.2–2.8 eV obtained from optical absorption and photoemission studies. It is shown that this difference between the fundamental and optical gaps is due to the presence of a surface electron accumulation layer, which results in a Burstein–Moss shift of the Fermi level well into the conduction band. The underlying cause of degenerate electron doping is due to “surface transfer doping” by ambient water molecules as a result of the high electron affinity of the semiconductor.

Journal of Applied PhysicsVol. 136(20)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.