Examining Wrongful Convictions in Chile: An Analysis of Supreme Court Exonerations in 2007 to 2023

Drawing on data from the Supreme Court case registry between 2007 and 2023, this study examines 63 cases of wrongful convictions in Chile. It aims to contribute to the global understanding of the factors leading to wrongful convictions while underscoring the importance of contextual differences. Our analysis reveals traditional factors such as mistaken eyewitness identification and official misconduct, alongside Chile-specific issues. Notably, identity theft, exacerbated by weak procedural safeguards, emerges as a predominant factor. We argue that Chile’s restrictive post-conviction review process needs reform, as it currently only identifies cases involving gross errors, thereby overlooking many wrongful convictions that might be recognized in other jurisdictions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime & Delinquency
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241301007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Wrongful Convictions in Chile: An Analysis of Supreme Court Exonerations in 2007 to 2023

Víctor Beltrán Román, Mauricio Duce
1 citations
Crime & Delinquency
Deception detection and forensic psychology
0.64
article

Examining Wrongful Convictions in Chile: An Analysis of Supreme Court Exonerations in 2007 to 2023

Víctor Beltrán Román, Mauricio Duce
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Drawing on data from the Supreme Court case registry between 2007 and 2023, this study examines 63 cases of wrongful convictions in Chile. It aims to contribute to the global understanding of the factors leading to wrongful convictions while underscoring the importance of contextual differences. Our analysis reveals traditional factors such as mistaken eyewitness identification and official misconduct, alongside Chile-specific issues. Notably, identity theft, exacerbated by weak procedural safeguards, emerges as a predominant factor. We argue that Chile’s restrictive post-conviction review process needs reform, as it currently only identifies cases involving gross errors, thereby overlooking many wrongful convictions that might be recognized in other jurisdictions

Crime & DelinquencyVol. 71(13-14)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.