Mathematics Discourse in Secondary Teacher Candidates’ Lessons: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Meaningful discourse in the mathematics classroom involves creating a learning community that empowers students to articulate their reasoning and make sense of the contributions of their peers while advancing the learning of mathematics for the entire class. This study assessed the degree to which secondary mathematics (Grades 7–12) teacher candidates incorporated discourse into their lessons and the factors influencing their decisions. An explanatory mixed methods design was used, in which data were collected sequentially. Lesson videos were analyzed, followed by interviews of teacher candidates with high-discourse lessons. This study found that participants showed significant growth in their use of effective teaching practices from the beginning of the semester to the end of the semester, including mathematics discourse. The interviews revealed four contributing factors: intentional effort, learning experiences, professional relationships, and pedagogical knowledge. Understanding the experiences of teacher candidates during their own learning of mathematics, their mathematical identities, and beliefs about mathematics could help generate knowledge regarding the implementation of mathematics discourse and other reform-based practices in teacher instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121286
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematics Discourse in Secondary Teacher Candidates’ Lessons: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Ashley Schmidt, Robert N. Ronau, Sarah B. Bush, Molly H. Fisher et al.
2 citations
Education Sciences
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
4.19
article

Mathematics Discourse in Secondary Teacher Candidates’ Lessons: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Ashley Schmidt, Robert N. Ronau, Sarah B. Bush, Molly H. Fisher, Suneeta Soni, Farshid Safi, Lisa Amick, Julian Viera, Christopher R. Rakes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Meaningful discourse in the mathematics classroom involves creating a learning community that empowers students to articulate their reasoning and make sense of the contributions of their peers while advancing the learning of mathematics for the entire class. This study assessed the degree to which secondary mathematics (Grades 7–12) teacher candidates incorporated discourse into their lessons and the factors influencing their decisions. An explanatory mixed methods design was used, in which data were collected sequentially. Lesson videos were analyzed, followed by interviews of teacher candidates with high-discourse lessons. This study found that participants showed significant growth in their use of effective teaching practices from the beginning of the semester to the end of the semester, including mathematics discourse. The interviews revealed four contributing factors: intentional effort, learning experiences, professional relationships, and pedagogical knowledge. Understanding the experiences of teacher candidates during their own learning of mathematics, their mathematical identities, and beliefs about mathematics could help generate knowledge regarding the implementation of mathematics discourse and other reform-based practices in teacher instruction.

Education SciencesVol. 14(12)
University of Central Florida (US), University of Louisville (US), University of Kentucky (US), Central Connecticut State University (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US), Rowan University (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), Berea College (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.