The Miocene subsidence pattern of the NW Zagros foreland basin reflects the southeastward propagating tear of the Neotethys slab

Abstract. Tectonic processes resulting from solid Earth dynamics control uplift and generate sediment accommodation space via subsidence. Unraveling the mechanism of basin subsidence elucidates the link between deep-Earth and surface processes. The NW Zagros fold–thrust belt resulted from the Cenozoic convergence and subsequent collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates. The associated Neogene foreland basin includes ∼3–4 km of synorogenic, mostly nonmarine, clastic sediments, suggesting a strongly subsiding basin inconsistent with the adjacent moderate topographic load. To explain such a discrepancy, we assessed the magnitude of the basin's subsidence with respect to the effect of the surface load and dynamic topography. The lower Miocene isopach map of the Fatha Formation displays a longitudinal depocenter aligned with the orogenic trend. In contrast, the middle–upper Miocene maps of the Injana and Mukdadiya formations illustrate a focused depocenter in the southeastern region of the basin. This rapid basin subsidence in the southeast during the middle–late Miocene was coeval with the Afar plume northward flow beyond the Arabia–Eurasia suture zone in the northwestern segment of the Zagros belt. Based on isopach maps, subsidence curves, and reconstructions of flexural profiles, supported by Bouguer anomaly data and maps of dynamic topography and seismic tomography, we argue for a two-stage basin evolution. The Zagros foreland basin subsided due to the combined loads of the surface topography and the subducting slab during the early Miocene and was affected by dynamic topography due to the Neotethys horizontal slab tear propagation during the middle–late Miocene. This tear propagation was associated with a northward mantle flow above the detached slab segment in the NW and a focused pull on the attached portion of the slab in the SE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solid Earth
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1365-2024
Citations
5
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Miocene subsidence pattern of the NW Zagros foreland basin reflects the southeastward propagating tear of the Neotethys slab

Renas I. Koshnaw, Fritz Schlunegger, Jonas Kley
5 citations
Solid Earth
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.67
article

The Miocene subsidence pattern of the NW Zagros foreland basin reflects the southeastward propagating tear of the Neotethys slab

Renas I. Koshnaw, Fritz Schlunegger, Jonas Kley
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Tectonic processes resulting from solid Earth dynamics control uplift and generate sediment accommodation space via subsidence. Unraveling the mechanism of basin subsidence elucidates the link between deep-Earth and surface processes. The NW Zagros fold–thrust belt resulted from the Cenozoic convergence and subsequent collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates. The associated Neogene foreland basin includes ∼3–4 km of synorogenic, mostly nonmarine, clastic sediments, suggesting a strongly subsiding basin inconsistent with the adjacent moderate topographic load. To explain such a discrepancy, we assessed the magnitude of the basin's subsidence with respect to the effect of the surface load and dynamic topography. The lower Miocene isopach map of the Fatha Formation displays a longitudinal depocenter aligned with the orogenic trend. In contrast, the middle–upper Miocene maps of the Injana and Mukdadiya formations illustrate a focused depocenter in the southeastern region of the basin. This rapid basin subsidence in the southeast during the middle–late Miocene was coeval with the Afar plume northward flow beyond the Arabia–Eurasia suture zone in the northwestern segment of the Zagros belt. Based on isopach maps, subsidence curves, and reconstructions of flexural profiles, supported by Bouguer anomaly data and maps of dynamic topography and seismic tomography, we argue for a two-stage basin evolution. The Zagros foreland basin subsided due to the combined loads of the surface topography and the subducting slab during the early Miocene and was affected by dynamic topography due to the Neotethys horizontal slab tear propagation during the middle–late Miocene. This tear propagation was associated with a northward mantle flow above the detached slab segment in the NW and a focused pull on the attached portion of the slab in the SE.

Solid EarthVol. 15(11)
University of Bern (CH), University of Göttingen (DE)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.