Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Acupuncture Treatment in Chronic Low Back Pain

This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in chronic low back pain using meta-analysis. Of the 743 acupuncture research studies assessed on academic databases, 11 studies with 12 samples were selected. Research participants' ages, female-to-male ratios, and initial and final Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were documented. In total, 388 patients, including 208 (53.61%) female and 180 (46.39%) male patients, were subjected to acupuncture due to low back pain. Mean age was 43.45 with 30.8-57.6 range. The initial VAS score mean was 5.79, and the final VAS score mean was 3.17. VAS difference mean was -2.62 with 0.47-5.26 range. Comparison with exercise and electrical acupuncture were insignificant (p>0.05), whereas differences between control and acupuncture groups were significant (p<0.05). Spearman’s rho correlation analysis results showed that VAS difference was only significantly correlated with VAS initial (r=-0.874; p<0.01). Female frequency, male frequency and age were not significantly correlated with VAS difference (p>0.05). Generalized Linear model (Logit) analysis results showed that age (OR=-0.055; p<0.05) and VAS initial (OR=-0.767; p<0.01) had a significant effect on VAS difference in patients having low back pain and had acupuncture treatment. Acupuncture is much more effective in the treatment of nonspecific chronic low back pain for both women and men, individuals of all age groups, but especially young people. The high level of initial pain is also one of the important factors affecting the success of low back pain treatment with acupuncture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical and Health Studies
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32996/jmhs.2024.5.4.17
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Venom Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Acupuncture Treatment in Chronic Low Back Pain

Aysun Özlü, Cemal Çevi̇k
Journal of Medical and Health Studies
Healthcare and Venom Research
article

Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Acupuncture Treatment in Chronic Low Back Pain

Aysun Özlü, Cemal Çevi̇k
article en

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in chronic low back pain using meta-analysis. Of the 743 acupuncture research studies assessed on academic databases, 11 studies with 12 samples were selected. Research participants' ages, female-to-male ratios, and initial and final Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were documented. In total, 388 patients, including 208 (53.61%) female and 180 (46.39%) male patients, were subjected to acupuncture due to low back pain. Mean age was 43.45 with 30.8-57.6 range. The initial VAS score mean was 5.79, and the final VAS score mean was 3.17. VAS difference mean was -2.62 with 0.47-5.26 range. Comparison with exercise and electrical acupuncture were insignificant (p>0.05), whereas differences between control and acupuncture groups were significant (p<0.05). Spearman’s rho correlation analysis results showed that VAS difference was only significantly correlated with VAS initial (r=-0.874; p<0.01). Female frequency, male frequency and age were not significantly correlated with VAS difference (p>0.05). Generalized Linear model (Logit) analysis results showed that age (OR=-0.055; p<0.05) and VAS initial (OR=-0.767; p<0.01) had a significant effect on VAS difference in patients having low back pain and had acupuncture treatment. Acupuncture is much more effective in the treatment of nonspecific chronic low back pain for both women and men, individuals of all age groups, but especially young people. The high level of initial pain is also one of the important factors affecting the success of low back pain treatment with acupuncture.

Journal of Medical and Health StudiesVol. 5(4)
Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Healthcare and Venom Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.