Forward-Scattering and Multiple-Scattering Sources of Errors in UV–Visible Spectroscopy of Microspheres

Conventional UV-visible spectroscopy instruments measure the extinction spectrum of solutions in a transmission configuration. Because of the finite (nonzero) acceptance angle in detection, errors due to forward scattering and multiple scattering can be introduced when measuring scattering samples. We here experimentally quantify these errors using polystyrene spheres of different sizes for two representative analytical/research UV-visible instruments, one based on a single-beam diode array and the other on a double-beam scanning configuration. The measured spectra for particles larger than 1 μm are shown to differ between the two instruments, even at low concentrations, and also vary with concentration (in contradiction with the Beer-Lambert law). We show that systematic errors in the range of 10-40% are common in such measurements. We propose a model accounting for both forward- and multiple-scattering errors and demonstrate its agreement with our experimental results. This model could reduce systematic errors in measurements of scattering samples by up to 40%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04912
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forward-Scattering and Multiple-Scattering Sources of Errors in UV–Visible Spectroscopy of Microspheres

Baptiste Auguié, A. Alidoust Ghatar, Eric C. Le Ru
1 citations
Analytical Chemistry
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
0.18
article

Forward-Scattering and Multiple-Scattering Sources of Errors in UV–Visible Spectroscopy of Microspheres

Baptiste Auguié, A. Alidoust Ghatar, Eric C. Le Ru
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conventional UV-visible spectroscopy instruments measure the extinction spectrum of solutions in a transmission configuration. Because of the finite (nonzero) acceptance angle in detection, errors due to forward scattering and multiple scattering can be introduced when measuring scattering samples. We here experimentally quantify these errors using polystyrene spheres of different sizes for two representative analytical/research UV-visible instruments, one based on a single-beam diode array and the other on a double-beam scanning configuration. The measured spectra for particles larger than 1 μm are shown to differ between the two instruments, even at low concentrations, and also vary with concentration (in contradiction with the Beer-Lambert law). We show that systematic errors in the range of 10-40% are common in such measurements. We propose a model accounting for both forward- and multiple-scattering errors and demonstrate its agreement with our experimental results. This model could reduce systematic errors in measurements of scattering samples by up to 40%.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 96(49)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology (NZ)
Marsden Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forward-Scattering and Multiple-Scattering Sources of Errors in UV–Visible Spectroscopy of Microspheres — Baptiste Auguié, A. Alidoust Ghatar, et al. · Analytical Chemistry (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS