Conceptualizing and Testing Public Expectations for Corporate Social Advocacy: A Strategic Issue Management Approach

This study examines public expectations regarding Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) using the framework of strategic issue management (SIM). A 14-item, single-factor scale was developed to measure CSA expectations, which was validated through four surveys. The CSA expectancy scale will assist businesses in effectively navigating CSA initiatives, preventing stakeholder support withdrawal, and thus bolstering organizational sustainability and social impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241296460
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualizing and Testing Public Expectations for Corporate Social Advocacy: A Strategic Issue Management Approach

Myungok Chris Yim, Taeyoung Kim
3 citations
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
1.66
article

Conceptualizing and Testing Public Expectations for Corporate Social Advocacy: A Strategic Issue Management Approach

Myungok Chris Yim, Taeyoung Kim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study examines public expectations regarding Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) using the framework of strategic issue management (SIM). A 14-item, single-factor scale was developed to measure CSA expectations, which was validated through four surveys. The CSA expectancy scale will assist businesses in effectively navigating CSA initiatives, preventing stakeholder support withdrawal, and thus bolstering organizational sustainability and social impact.

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.