Cellular and Humoral Response After Induction of Protection and After Finishing Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy

<i>Hymenoptera</i> venom allergy (HVA) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction caused by <i>Hymenoptera</i> species stings (honeybee, vespid, or ant). The only effective treatment is <i>Hymenoptera</i> venom immunotherapy (VIT). Our study aimed to evaluate whether humoral and cellular biomarkers measured before, during, and after honeybee VIT are associated with the success of VIT, which was assessed by the response to a sting challenge one year after finishing VIT. In this prospective study, blood biomarkers of 25 patients undergoing honeybee VIT at the referral center in Slovenia were evaluated. A controlled honeybee sting challenge confirmed successful VIT in 20 of 25 (80%) patients. Honeybee venom (HBV) recombinant allergen profiles, evaluated before the treatment, were comparable between responders and non-responders. Longitudinal follow-up, up to 1 year after finishing VIT, showed that the immune responses do not differ significantly between patients with successful VIT and treatment failure. Those responses were characterized by decreased sIgE, tIgE, and BST, whereas sIgG4 levels increased. The basophil sensitivity also significantly decreases after VIT in both groups of patients. The analyzed biomarker which correlated considerably with treatment failure was higher basophil sensitivity to allergen stimulation before VIT. Similarly, systemic adverse events (SAEs) during the build-up phase of VIT correlated with treatment failure. Our study demonstrated similar sensitization profiles, and humoral and basophil immune responses to immunotherapy, in two different well-characterized groups of patients, one with successful VIT and the other with treatment failure. Notably, only high basophil sensitivity measured before VIT and SAEs during VIT were significantly associated with VIT failure, and both have the potential to be predictors of VIT failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomolecules
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14121494
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cellular and Humoral Response After Induction of Protection and After Finishing Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy

Urška Bidovec‐Stojkovič, Ajda Demšar Luzar, Jerneja Debeljak, Matija Rijavec et al.
Biomolecules
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Cellular and Humoral Response After Induction of Protection and After Finishing Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy

Urška Bidovec‐Stojkovič, Ajda Demšar Luzar, Jerneja Debeljak, Matija Rijavec, Peter Korošec, Mihaela Zidarn, Peter Kopač, Mitja Košnik
article en

Abstract

<i>Hymenoptera</i> venom allergy (HVA) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction caused by <i>Hymenoptera</i> species stings (honeybee, vespid, or ant). The only effective treatment is <i>Hymenoptera</i> venom immunotherapy (VIT). Our study aimed to evaluate whether humoral and cellular biomarkers measured before, during, and after honeybee VIT are associated with the success of VIT, which was assessed by the response to a sting challenge one year after finishing VIT. In this prospective study, blood biomarkers of 25 patients undergoing honeybee VIT at the referral center in Slovenia were evaluated. A controlled honeybee sting challenge confirmed successful VIT in 20 of 25 (80%) patients. Honeybee venom (HBV) recombinant allergen profiles, evaluated before the treatment, were comparable between responders and non-responders. Longitudinal follow-up, up to 1 year after finishing VIT, showed that the immune responses do not differ significantly between patients with successful VIT and treatment failure. Those responses were characterized by decreased sIgE, tIgE, and BST, whereas sIgG4 levels increased. The basophil sensitivity also significantly decreases after VIT in both groups of patients. The analyzed biomarker which correlated considerably with treatment failure was higher basophil sensitivity to allergen stimulation before VIT. Similarly, systemic adverse events (SAEs) during the build-up phase of VIT correlated with treatment failure. Our study demonstrated similar sensitization profiles, and humoral and basophil immune responses to immunotherapy, in two different well-characterized groups of patients, one with successful VIT and the other with treatment failure. Notably, only high basophil sensitivity measured before VIT and SAEs during VIT were significantly associated with VIT failure, and both have the potential to be predictors of VIT failure.

BiomoleculesVol. 14(12)
University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Maribor (SI), University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.