Human biomonitoring health-based guidance values: A case study of the HB2GV Dashboard and DEHP

In 2022, the International Society of Exposure Science (ISES) International Human Biomonitoring (i-HBM) Working Group launched a free, online repository of biomonitoring guidance values referred to as the Human Biomonitoring Health-Based Guidance Value (HB2GV) Dashboard. The goal of the Dashboard is to assist global human biomonitoring data users (e.g., risk assessors, risk managers) and human biomonitoring programs with a readily available compilation of guidance values for the general population. The Dashboard contains approximately 600 HB2GVs for over 150 chemicals or their metabolites. Although there are many different types of HB2GVs, most are Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs), Human Biomonitoring (HBM-I and HBM-II) values, or Human Biomonitoring Guidance Values (HBM-GVs). For users new to human biomonitoring, understanding how the different types of HB2GVs are derived and how to interpret those values in the context of human biomonitoring data can be difficult. Therefore, there is a need to inform users of the differences among available guidance values and to help users identify the HB2GV that could be most suitable for their purposes. Here, we summarize the derivation of HB2GVs for a case study chemical, di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). We selected DEHP as there are 36 unique HB2GVs available from three of the most common types of guidance values (i.e., BE, HBM-I value, HBM-GV). We also compare the available HB2GVs with a focus on the differences among their derivation methods, relative quality and confidence, and interpretation. This case study provides guidance on the use of existing HB2GVs for health-based interpretation of human biomonitoring data that may be applied to other chemicals. As with any other type of guidance or regulatory value (e.g., RfDs, MRLs), thoughtful selection and use are strongly encouraged. Appropriately interpreting HBM data with the aid of guidance values can result in improved decision making which, ultimately, could lead to better protection of public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114490
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human biomonitoring health-based guidance values: A case study of the HB2GV Dashboard and DEHP

Devika Poddalgoda, Marike Kolossa‐Gehring, Tyler Pollock, Annie St-Amand et al.
4 citations
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
4.52
article

Human biomonitoring health-based guidance values: A case study of the HB2GV Dashboard and DEHP

Devika Poddalgoda, Marike Kolossa‐Gehring, Tyler Pollock, Annie St-Amand, Judy S. LaKind, Lisa Jo Melnyk, Rosa Lange, Kristin Macey, Petra Apel, Antonia M. Calafat, Shoji F. Nakayama
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In 2022, the International Society of Exposure Science (ISES) International Human Biomonitoring (i-HBM) Working Group launched a free, online repository of biomonitoring guidance values referred to as the Human Biomonitoring Health-Based Guidance Value (HB2GV) Dashboard. The goal of the Dashboard is to assist global human biomonitoring data users (e.g., risk assessors, risk managers) and human biomonitoring programs with a readily available compilation of guidance values for the general population. The Dashboard contains approximately 600 HB2GVs for over 150 chemicals or their metabolites. Although there are many different types of HB2GVs, most are Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs), Human Biomonitoring (HBM-I and HBM-II) values, or Human Biomonitoring Guidance Values (HBM-GVs). For users new to human biomonitoring, understanding how the different types of HB2GVs are derived and how to interpret those values in the context of human biomonitoring data can be difficult. Therefore, there is a need to inform users of the differences among available guidance values and to help users identify the HB2GV that could be most suitable for their purposes. Here, we summarize the derivation of HB2GVs for a case study chemical, di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). We selected DEHP as there are 36 unique HB2GVs available from three of the most common types of guidance values (i.e., BE, HBM-I value, HBM-GV). We also compare the available HB2GVs with a focus on the differences among their derivation methods, relative quality and confidence, and interpretation. This case study provides guidance on the use of existing HB2GVs for health-based interpretation of human biomonitoring data that may be applied to other chemicals. As with any other type of guidance or regulatory value (e.g., RfDs, MRLs), thoughtful selection and use are strongly encouraged. Appropriately interpreting HBM data with the aid of guidance values can result in improved decision making which, ultimately, could lead to better protection of public health.

International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental HealthVol. 263
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Health Canada (CA), Environmental Protection Agency (US), Environmental Protection Agency (GH), National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP), National Center for Environmental Health (US), National Center for Environmental Assessment (EPA) (US), German Environment Agency (DE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Canadian Dairy Commission
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.