COGNITIVE DIAGNOSTIC MODELING ON ASSESSMENT IN HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONS EDUCATION: A RAPID SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL

Background: The fast-rising supply of healthcare professional schools imposes improvement on assessment methodologies/strategies as to ensures achievement of sufficient healthcare professional competency, professional’s own health and wellbeing, and patient safety. Ascertain which learner has or has not reached sufficiency in a specific healthcare profession must be determined. Objective: The primary objective of this article is to present the protocol of a rapid scoping review to map the literature regarding the use of Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (CDM) on assessment in healthcare professions education. Methods: This rapid scoping review protocol is registered on Open Science Framework (OSF) and followed Joanna Brigg Institute’s (JBI) updated manual for scoping reviews, Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and adhered to STructured apprOach to the Reporting In healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis (STORIES) and Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) guidelines. A systematic and comprehensive search across MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, LILACS, MedEdPublish and the grey literature will be conducted without date, language and study design restrictions. This review will include studies on assessment of undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical and health professions’ education. Study selection and data extraction will be undertaken by two independent authors and synthesized into various strategies as to ensure representation of the state of the art on the use of CMD in assessment of healthcare professional education. Results: This rapid scoping review is anticipated to map CMD applications in healthcare professional education, including for admissions, progress test, assessment, and clinical reasoning. Conclusion: The findings of this rapid scoping review protocol will contribute to ensure relevance and understanding of and gap identification on the use of CDM in assessment of healthcare professions education. Futhermore, they might help academic staff, administration, and researchers in healthcare education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arquivos de Ciências da Saúde da UNIPAR
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25110/arqsaude.v28i2.2024-11610
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COGNITIVE DIAGNOSTIC MODELING ON ASSESSMENT IN HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONS EDUCATION: A RAPID SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL

José Lúcio Martins Machado, Nathan Mendes Souza, Carlos Fernando Collares, Clarice Magalhães Rodrigues dos Reis et al.
Arquivos de Ciências da Saúde da UNIPAR
Radiology practices and education
article

COGNITIVE DIAGNOSTIC MODELING ON ASSESSMENT IN HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONS EDUCATION: A RAPID SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL

José Lúcio Martins Machado, Nathan Mendes Souza, Carlos Fernando Collares, Clarice Magalhães Rodrigues dos Reis, Marcus Vinícius Melo de Andrade, Gesner Francisco Xavier, Rosa Malena Delbone de Faria, Eduardha Santos Temponi Barroso
article en

Abstract

Background: The fast-rising supply of healthcare professional schools imposes improvement on assessment methodologies/strategies as to ensures achievement of sufficient healthcare professional competency, professional’s own health and wellbeing, and patient safety. Ascertain which learner has or has not reached sufficiency in a specific healthcare profession must be determined. Objective: The primary objective of this article is to present the protocol of a rapid scoping review to map the literature regarding the use of Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (CDM) on assessment in healthcare professions education. Methods: This rapid scoping review protocol is registered on Open Science Framework (OSF) and followed Joanna Brigg Institute’s (JBI) updated manual for scoping reviews, Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and adhered to STructured apprOach to the Reporting In healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis (STORIES) and Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) guidelines. A systematic and comprehensive search across MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, LILACS, MedEdPublish and the grey literature will be conducted without date, language and study design restrictions. This review will include studies on assessment of undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical and health professions’ education. Study selection and data extraction will be undertaken by two independent authors and synthesized into various strategies as to ensure representation of the state of the art on the use of CMD in assessment of healthcare professional education. Results: This rapid scoping review is anticipated to map CMD applications in healthcare professional education, including for admissions, progress test, assessment, and clinical reasoning. Conclusion: The findings of this rapid scoping review protocol will contribute to ensure relevance and understanding of and gap identification on the use of CDM in assessment of healthcare professions education. Futhermore, they might help academic staff, administration, and researchers in healthcare education.

Arquivos de Ciências da Saúde da UNIPARVol. 28(2)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte (BR), Grupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte (BR), Insper (BR), University of Minho (PT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.