Student and Instructor Perceptions and Uses of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) applications have recently become more powerful and accessible. There has been much discussion about the potential impacts of AI on learning and sample applications. Yet, little research exists on how and to what extent AI is being used in educational contexts. Objective The purpose of this study was to examine and compare students’ and instructors’ perceptions and uses of AI in educational settings. Method A sample of 113 undergraduate students and 71 instructors at a public university completed an online survey in which they reported how and how often they use AI for educational and instructional purposes and their views of its potential benefits and detriments to learning. Results Students and instructors reported relatively low AI usage, similar views on potential benefits and detriments to learning, and similar views on acceptable academic use. However, their perceptions diverged in several important ways. Conclusion This research highlights the need for policy, transparency, training, and nuanced discussions about how to use AI effectively and responsibly to promote learning goals. Teaching Implications The survey instruments developed for this study may be useful tools for facilitating conversations, clarifying expectations, and expanding understanding of AI uses in psychology programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241299745
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student and Instructor Perceptions and Uses of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Tesia Marshik, Bryan Kopp, C. C. McCracken, Morgan O’Marrah
10 citations
Teaching of Psychology
Online Learning and Analytics
4.12
article

Student and Instructor Perceptions and Uses of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Tesia Marshik, Bryan Kopp, C. C. McCracken, Morgan O’Marrah
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) applications have recently become more powerful and accessible. There has been much discussion about the potential impacts of AI on learning and sample applications. Yet, little research exists on how and to what extent AI is being used in educational contexts. Objective The purpose of this study was to examine and compare students’ and instructors’ perceptions and uses of AI in educational settings. Method A sample of 113 undergraduate students and 71 instructors at a public university completed an online survey in which they reported how and how often they use AI for educational and instructional purposes and their views of its potential benefits and detriments to learning. Results Students and instructors reported relatively low AI usage, similar views on potential benefits and detriments to learning, and similar views on acceptable academic use. However, their perceptions diverged in several important ways. Conclusion This research highlights the need for policy, transparency, training, and nuanced discussions about how to use AI effectively and responsibly to promote learning goals. Teaching Implications The survey instruments developed for this study may be useful tools for facilitating conversations, clarifying expectations, and expanding understanding of AI uses in psychology programs.

Teaching of PsychologyVol. 52(3)
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Online Learning and Analytics
4.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.