Parity and lepton masses in the left-right symmetric model

Curiously, in the minimal left right symmetric model chiral symmetry that protects the electron’s mass (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>m</a:mi><a:mi>e</a:mi></a:msub></a:math>), due to parity (<c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>P</c:mi></c:math>), implies in the symmetry limit the vanishing of its neutrino mixing angles. We break the chiral symmetry softly (or spontaneously if it is gauged) to generate the observed large neutrino mixing angles at the tree-level. The electron then acquires its mass on renormalization group equation (RGE) running due to its neutrino’s mixing, and in turn determines the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>B</e:mi><e:mo>−</e:mo><e:mi>L</e:mi></e:math> gauge symmetry breaking scale (<g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msub><g:mi>v</g:mi><g:mi>R</g:mi></g:msub></g:math>) to be <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msup><i:mn>10</i:mn><i:mn>10</i:mn></i:msup><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mi>GeV</i:mi><i:mo>≲</i:mo><i:msub><i:mi>v</i:mi><i:mi>R</i:mi></i:msub><i:mo>≤</i:mo><i:msup><i:mn>10</i:mn><i:mn>15</i:mn></i:msup><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mi>GeV</i:mi></i:math>. If the muon’s mass is also generated radiatively, the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mi>B</k:mi><k:mo>−</k:mo><k:mi>L</k:mi></k:math> breaking scale is <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mo>∼</m:mo><m:msup><m:mn>10</m:mn><m:mrow><m:mn>14</m:mn><m:mo>−</m:mo><m:mn>15</m:mn></m:mrow></m:msup><m:mtext> </m:mtext><m:mtext> </m:mtext><m:mi>GeV</m:mi></m:math>. Regardless of the high scale of <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:msub><o:mi>v</o:mi><o:mi>R</o:mi></o:msub></o:math>, this is a testable model since on RGE running and <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>P</q:mi></q:math> breaking, a large strong <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:mi>C</s:mi><s:mi>P</s:mi></s:math> phase (<u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mover accent="true"><u:mi>θ</u:mi><u:mo stretchy="false">¯</u:mo></u:mover><u:mo>≫</u:mo><u:msup><u:mn>10</u:mn><u:mrow><u:mo>−</u:mo><u:mn>10</u:mn></u:mrow></u:msup></u:math>) which depends logarithmically on <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:msub><y:mi>v</y:mi><y:mi>R</y:mi></y:msub></y:math> is generated if there is <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mi mathvariant="script">O</ab:mi><ab:mo stretchy="false">(</ab:mo><ab:mn>1</ab:mn><ab:mo stretchy="false">)</ab:mo></ab:math> <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:mi>C</fb:mi><fb:mi>P</fb:mi></fb:math> violation in leptonic Yukawa couplings. Hence we expect that leptonic <hb:math xmlns:hb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hb:mi>C</hb:mi><hb:mi>P</hb:mi></hb:math> phases including the Dirac <jb:math xmlns:jb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jb:mi>C</jb:mi><jb:mi>P</jb:mi></jb:math> phase <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><lb:msub><lb:mi>δ</lb:mi><lb:mrow><lb:mi>C</lb:mi><lb:mi>P</lb:mi></lb:mrow></lb:msub></lb:math> of the PMNS matrix must be consistent with 0 or <nb:math xmlns:nb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><nb:msup><nb:mn>180</nb:mn><nb:mi>o</nb:mi></nb:msup></nb:math> to within a degree, which can be verified or excluded by neutrino experiments such as DUNE and Hyper-Kamiokande. In lieu of <pb:math xmlns:pb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><pb:mi>P</pb:mi></pb:math>, if charge conjugation <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><rb:mi>C</rb:mi></rb:math> is used, the same results follow. However with <tb:math xmlns:tb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><tb:mi>C</tb:mi></tb:math> and no <vb:math xmlns:vb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><vb:mi>P</vb:mi></vb:math>, axions would likely need to be added anyway, in which case there is no constraint on <xb:math xmlns:xb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><xb:msub><xb:mi>δ</xb:mi><xb:mrow><xb:mi>C</xb:mi><xb:mi>P</xb:mi></xb:mrow></xb:msub></xb:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.095028
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parity and lepton masses in the left-right symmetric model

Ravi Kuchimanchi
3 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
1.98
article

Parity and lepton masses in the left-right symmetric model

Ravi Kuchimanchi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Curiously, in the minimal left right symmetric model chiral symmetry that protects the electron’s mass (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>m</a:mi><a:mi>e</a:mi></a:msub></a:math>), due to parity (<c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>P</c:mi></c:math>), implies in the symmetry limit the vanishing of its neutrino mixing angles. We break the chiral symmetry softly (or spontaneously if it is gauged) to generate the observed large neutrino mixing angles at the tree-level. The electron then acquires its mass on renormalization group equation (RGE) running due to its neutrino’s mixing, and in turn determines the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>B</e:mi><e:mo>−</e:mo><e:mi>L</e:mi></e:math> gauge symmetry breaking scale (<g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msub><g:mi>v</g:mi><g:mi>R</g:mi></g:msub></g:math>) to be <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msup><i:mn>10</i:mn><i:mn>10</i:mn></i:msup><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mi>GeV</i:mi><i:mo>≲</i:mo><i:msub><i:mi>v</i:mi><i:mi>R</i:mi></i:msub><i:mo>≤</i:mo><i:msup><i:mn>10</i:mn><i:mn>15</i:mn></i:msup><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mi>GeV</i:mi></i:math>. If the muon’s mass is also generated radiatively, the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mi>B</k:mi><k:mo>−</k:mo><k:mi>L</k:mi></k:math> breaking scale is <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mo>∼</m:mo><m:msup><m:mn>10</m:mn><m:mrow><m:mn>14</m:mn><m:mo>−</m:mo><m:mn>15</m:mn></m:mrow></m:msup><m:mtext> </m:mtext><m:mtext> </m:mtext><m:mi>GeV</m:mi></m:math>. Regardless of the high scale of <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:msub><o:mi>v</o:mi><o:mi>R</o:mi></o:msub></o:math>, this is a testable model since on RGE running and <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>P</q:mi></q:math> breaking, a large strong <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:mi>C</s:mi><s:mi>P</s:mi></s:math> phase (<u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mover accent="true"><u:mi>θ</u:mi><u:mo stretchy="false">¯</u:mo></u:mover><u:mo>≫</u:mo><u:msup><u:mn>10</u:mn><u:mrow><u:mo>−</u:mo><u:mn>10</u:mn></u:mrow></u:msup></u:math>) which depends logarithmically on <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:msub><y:mi>v</y:mi><y:mi>R</y:mi></y:msub></y:math> is generated if there is <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mi mathvariant="script">O</ab:mi><ab:mo stretchy="false">(</ab:mo><ab:mn>1</ab:mn><ab:mo stretchy="false">)</ab:mo></ab:math> <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:mi>C</fb:mi><fb:mi>P</fb:mi></fb:math> violation in leptonic Yukawa couplings. Hence we expect that leptonic <hb:math xmlns:hb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hb:mi>C</hb:mi><hb:mi>P</hb:mi></hb:math> phases including the Dirac <jb:math xmlns:jb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jb:mi>C</jb:mi><jb:mi>P</jb:mi></jb:math> phase <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><lb:msub><lb:mi>δ</lb:mi><lb:mrow><lb:mi>C</lb:mi><lb:mi>P</lb:mi></lb:mrow></lb:msub></lb:math> of the PMNS matrix must be consistent with 0 or <nb:math xmlns:nb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><nb:msup><nb:mn>180</nb:mn><nb:mi>o</nb:mi></nb:msup></nb:math> to within a degree, which can be verified or excluded by neutrino experiments such as DUNE and Hyper-Kamiokande. In lieu of <pb:math xmlns:pb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><pb:mi>P</pb:mi></pb:math>, if charge conjugation <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><rb:mi>C</rb:mi></rb:math> is used, the same results follow. However with <tb:math xmlns:tb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><tb:mi>C</tb:mi></tb:math> and no <vb:math xmlns:vb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><vb:mi>P</vb:mi></vb:math>, axions would likely need to be added anyway, in which case there is no constraint on <xb:math xmlns:xb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><xb:msub><xb:mi>δ</xb:mi><xb:mrow><xb:mi>C</xb:mi><xb:mi>P</xb:mi></xb:mrow></xb:msub></xb:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.