Cost Benefit Analysis of Silviculture-based Forest Management in Nepal

Silviculture-based Forest management is one of the sustainable ways of managing forests initiated in Nepal about a decade ago. This paper conducts a cost-benefit analysis of silviculture-based forest management in selected communities and collaborative forests in the Kapilvastu and Rupandehi districts in Nepal’s mid-terai region. Related data were collected from the financial records of the forest user groups, and the collected data were complemented and triangulated by conducting Key Informant Interviews. The results exhibited high profitability of silviculture-based forest management in Nepal. Disaggregation by the regime of forest management further showed the high profitability of collaborative forest compared to the community forest. The net present value (and benefit-cost ratio) of the collaborative forest was Nepalese Rs. 1.01 million (and 2.26), while that of the community forest was Nepalese Rs. 0.56 million (and 1.45). The results are robust to cost increment and benefit decrement by a margin of 10%. The study recommends the promotion of collaborative forests as a cost-effective alternative to improve the socio-economic profile of forest-dependent communities. The study also suggests including a cost-benefit analysis of forest management in forest plans to ensure sustainable forest management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forest Economics
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000581
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost Benefit Analysis of Silviculture-based Forest Management in Nepal

Kishor Aryal, Nirmal Kumar Raut
Journal of Forest Economics
Forest Management and Policy
article

Cost Benefit Analysis of Silviculture-based Forest Management in Nepal

Kishor Aryal, Nirmal Kumar Raut
article en

Abstract

Silviculture-based Forest management is one of the sustainable ways of managing forests initiated in Nepal about a decade ago. This paper conducts a cost-benefit analysis of silviculture-based forest management in selected communities and collaborative forests in the Kapilvastu and Rupandehi districts in Nepal’s mid-terai region. Related data were collected from the financial records of the forest user groups, and the collected data were complemented and triangulated by conducting Key Informant Interviews. The results exhibited high profitability of silviculture-based forest management in Nepal. Disaggregation by the regime of forest management further showed the high profitability of collaborative forest compared to the community forest. The net present value (and benefit-cost ratio) of the collaborative forest was Nepalese Rs. 1.01 million (and 2.26), while that of the community forest was Nepalese Rs. 0.56 million (and 1.45). The results are robust to cost increment and benefit decrement by a margin of 10%. The study recommends the promotion of collaborative forests as a cost-effective alternative to improve the socio-economic profile of forest-dependent communities. The study also suggests including a cost-benefit analysis of forest management in forest plans to ensure sustainable forest management.

Journal of Forest EconomicsVol. 39(3)
Tribhuvan University (NP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost Benefit Analysis of Silviculture-based Forest Management in Nepal — Kishor Aryal, Nirmal Kumar Raut · Journal of Forest Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS