Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication.

Authors

Brad Morse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1080-3961)
Carmen L. Lewis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-2850)
Laura Danielle Scherer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-7115)
Jolyn Hersch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-6639)
Joseph N. Cappella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1998-4826)
Kirsten J. McCaffery (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-5006)
Heather L. Smyth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-4096)
Channing E. Tate (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-9794)
Marilyn M. Schapira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-9462)
Bridget Mosley

Institutions

The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
University of Colorado Denver (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Health Psychology
Published: 2024-11-25
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001442
Citations: 1
Primary Topic: Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.28

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication.

Brad Morse, Carmen L. Lewis, Laura Danielle Scherer, Jolyn Hersch et al.

Nov 25, 2024

1 citations

Health Psychology

Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

0.28

article

Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication.

Brad Morse, Carmen L. Lewis, Laura Danielle Scherer, Jolyn Hersch, Joseph N. Cappella, Kirsten J. McCaffery, Heather L. Smyth, Channing E. Tate, Marilyn M. Schapira, Bridget Mosley

November 25, 2024article en

1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

Health PsychologyVol. 44(6)

The University of Sydney (AU), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)

Good health and well-being

Openalex Percentile: Top 34%

Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

0.28

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.