Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for healthcare decisions: a bibliometric study

Healthcare has a direct impact on human life and involves risk factors, uncertainties and preferences. The complexity and implications of actions in this area and the demand for rational and transparent decision processes has resulted in the widespread use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods. As such, this study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the literature on the use of MCDA in healthcare, as well as analyzing the reasons presented in the articles for selecting MCDA methods, when applicable. The study analyzed 195 articles in the Scopus and PubMed databases between 1991 and 2019. The results were presented in graphs that focused on the main objectives of the study, highlighting the fact that only 28% of the articles presented justifications for the methods chosen. Many of the justifications were not well founded. It was concluded that care is needed to ensure appropriate selection of multi-criteria methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reciis
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v18iahead-of-print.3996
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for healthcare decisions: a bibliometric study

Smirna Marques Felinto da Silveira Fernandes, Renan Felinto de Farias Aires
Reciis
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for healthcare decisions: a bibliometric study

Smirna Marques Felinto da Silveira Fernandes, Renan Felinto de Farias Aires
article en

Abstract

Healthcare has a direct impact on human life and involves risk factors, uncertainties and preferences. The complexity and implications of actions in this area and the demand for rational and transparent decision processes has resulted in the widespread use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods. As such, this study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the literature on the use of MCDA in healthcare, as well as analyzing the reasons presented in the articles for selecting MCDA methods, when applicable. The study analyzed 195 articles in the Scopus and PubMed databases between 1991 and 2019. The results were presented in graphs that focused on the main objectives of the study, highlighting the fact that only 28% of the articles presented justifications for the methods chosen. Many of the justifications were not well founded. It was concluded that care is needed to ensure appropriate selection of multi-criteria methods.

ReciisVol. 18(Ahead-of-Print)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.