The Prognostic Role of Pulmonary Arterial Elastance in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Pilot Study

<b>Background</b>: Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) is a helpful parameter to predict the risk of acute postoperative right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A new method for calculating Ea, obtained by the ratio between transpulmonary gradient and stroke volume (Ea<sup>B</sup>), has been proposed as a more accurate measure than the Ea obtained as the ratio between pulmonary artery systolic pressure and stroke volume (Ea<sup>C</sup>). However, the role of Ea<sup>B</sup> in predicting acute RVF post-LVAD implantation remains unclear. <b>Methods and Results</b>: A total of 35 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed in this retrospective analysis. Acute RVF after LVAD implantation occurred in 12 patients (34%): 5 patients with moderate RVF (14% of total) and 7 patients with severe RVF. The Ea<sup>B</sup> was not significantly different between the "severe RVF" vs. "not-severe RVF" groups (0.27 ± 0.04 vs 0.23 ± 0.1, <i>p</i> < 0.403). However, the combination of arterial elastance and central venous pressure was significantly different between the "not-severe RVF" group (central venous pressure < 14 mmHg and Ea<sup>C</sup> < 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea<sup>B</sup> < 0.24 mmHg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.005) and the "severe RVF" group (central venous pressure > 14 mmHg and Ea<sup>C</sup> > 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea<sup>B</sup> > 0.24 mmHg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.005). <b>Conclusions</b>: Ea is a reliable parameter of right ventricular afterload and helps discriminate the risk of acute RVF after LVAD implantation. The combined analysis of Ea and central venous pressure can also risk stratify patients undergoing LVAD implantation for the development of RVF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237102
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prognostic Role of Pulmonary Arterial Elastance in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Pilot Study

Andrea Montalto, Emanuele Monda, Rita Gravino, Emilio Di Lorenzo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
article

The Prognostic Role of Pulmonary Arterial Elastance in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Pilot Study

Andrea Montalto, Emanuele Monda, Rita Gravino, Emilio Di Lorenzo, Marco Di Mauro, Daniele Masarone, Rita Lucia Putini, M. Kittleson, Giulio Cacioli, Fabio Sbaraglia, Marina Comisso, Vincenzo Polizzi, Andrea Petraio, Cristiano Amarelli, V Di Piazza, Francesco Musumeci, Claudio Marra, Marisa De Feo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) is a helpful parameter to predict the risk of acute postoperative right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A new method for calculating Ea, obtained by the ratio between transpulmonary gradient and stroke volume (Ea<sup>B</sup>), has been proposed as a more accurate measure than the Ea obtained as the ratio between pulmonary artery systolic pressure and stroke volume (Ea<sup>C</sup>). However, the role of Ea<sup>B</sup> in predicting acute RVF post-LVAD implantation remains unclear. <b>Methods and Results</b>: A total of 35 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed in this retrospective analysis. Acute RVF after LVAD implantation occurred in 12 patients (34%): 5 patients with moderate RVF (14% of total) and 7 patients with severe RVF. The Ea<sup>B</sup> was not significantly different between the "severe RVF" vs. "not-severe RVF" groups (0.27 ± 0.04 vs 0.23 ± 0.1, <i>p</i> < 0.403). However, the combination of arterial elastance and central venous pressure was significantly different between the "not-severe RVF" group (central venous pressure < 14 mmHg and Ea<sup>C</sup> < 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea<sup>B</sup> < 0.24 mmHg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.005) and the "severe RVF" group (central venous pressure > 14 mmHg and Ea<sup>C</sup> > 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea<sup>B</sup> > 0.24 mmHg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.005). <b>Conclusions</b>: Ea is a reliable parameter of right ventricular afterload and helps discriminate the risk of acute RVF after LVAD implantation. The combined analysis of Ea and central venous pressure can also risk stratify patients undergoing LVAD implantation for the development of RVF.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(23)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), ASL Roma (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini (IT), Ospedale Vincenzo Cervello (IT), Ospedale Monaldi (IT), Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute (US), Ospedale generale di zona San Camillo Treviso (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.