Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of multiregion brain cell count data

We can now collect cell-count data across whole animal brains quantifying recent neuronal activity, gene expression, or anatomical connectivity. This is a powerful approach since it is a multiregion measurement, but because the imaging is done postmortem, each animal only provides one set of counts. Experiments are expensive, and since cells are counted by imaging and aligning a large number of brain sections, they are time-intensive. The resulting datasets tend to be undersampled with fewer animals than brain regions. As a consequence, these data are a challenge for traditional statistical approaches. We present a 'standard' partially pooled Bayesian model for multiregion cell-count data and apply it to two example datasets. These examples demonstrate that hierarchical Bayesian methods are well suited to these data. In both cases, the Bayesian model outperformed standard parallel <i>t</i>-tests. Overall, inference for cell-count data is substantially improved by the ability of the Bayesian approach to capture nested data and by its rigorous handling of uncertainty in undersampled data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eLife
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.102391
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of multiregion brain cell count data

Conor Houghton, Elizabeth C. Warburton, Alessio Delogu, Lucy Menage et al.
2 links
eLife
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of multiregion brain cell count data

Conor Houghton, Elizabeth C. Warburton, Alessio Delogu, Lucy Menage, Simon R. Schultz, Sydney Dimmock, Cian O’Donnell, Gerald Moore, Benjamin MS Exley
article en

Abstract

We can now collect cell-count data across whole animal brains quantifying recent neuronal activity, gene expression, or anatomical connectivity. This is a powerful approach since it is a multiregion measurement, but because the imaging is done postmortem, each animal only provides one set of counts. Experiments are expensive, and since cells are counted by imaging and aligning a large number of brain sections, they are time-intensive. The resulting datasets tend to be undersampled with fewer animals than brain regions. As a consequence, these data are a challenge for traditional statistical approaches. We present a 'standard' partially pooled Bayesian model for multiregion cell-count data and apply it to two example datasets. These examples demonstrate that hierarchical Bayesian methods are well suited to these data. In both cases, the Bayesian model outperformed standard parallel <i>t</i>-tests. Overall, inference for cell-count data is substantially improved by the ability of the Bayesian approach to capture nested data and by its rigorous handling of uncertainty in undersampled data.

eLifeVol. 13
University of Ulster (GB), King's College London (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Neuroscience Institute (IT), Imperial College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.