A Systematic Comparison of Large Language Models Performance for Intrusion Detection

We explore the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist or substitute devices (i.e., firewalls) and humans (i.e., security experts) respectively in the detection and analysis of security incidents. We leverage transformer-based technologies, from relatively small to foundational sizes, to address the problem of correctly identifying the attack severity (and accessorily identifying and explaining the attack type). We contrast a broad range of LLM techniques (prompting, retrieval augmented generation, and fine-tuning of several models) using state-of-the-art machine learning models as a baseline. Using proprietary data from commercial deployment, our study provides an unbiased picture of the strengths and weaknesses of LLM for intrusion detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Networking
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696379
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Comparison of Large Language Models Performance for Intrusion Detection

Matteo Boffa, Rodolfo Valentim, Zied Ben Houidi, Dario Rossi et al.
11 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Networking
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
3.84
article

A Systematic Comparison of Large Language Models Performance for Intrusion Detection

Matteo Boffa, Rodolfo Valentim, Zied Ben Houidi, Dario Rossi, Fuxing Chen, Xiaosheng Bao, Minh-Thanh Bui
article en
11 citations

Abstract

We explore the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist or substitute devices (i.e., firewalls) and humans (i.e., security experts) respectively in the detection and analysis of security incidents. We leverage transformer-based technologies, from relatively small to foundational sizes, to address the problem of correctly identifying the attack severity (and accessorily identifying and explaining the attack type). We contrast a broad range of LLM techniques (prompting, retrieval augmented generation, and fine-tuning of several models) using state-of-the-art machine learning models as a baseline. Using proprietary data from commercial deployment, our study provides an unbiased picture of the strengths and weaknesses of LLM for intrusion detection.

Proceedings of the ACM on NetworkingVol. 2(CoNEXT4)
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Huawei Technologies (France) (FR), University of Turin (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
3.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Systematic Comparison of Large Language Models Performance for Intrusion Detection — Matteo Boffa, Rodolfo Valentim, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Networking (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS