On-site electronic consent in pediatrics using generic Informed Consent Service (gICS): Creating a specialized setup and collecting consent data

Enrolling in a clinical trial or study requires informed consent. Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure proper consent when storing samples in biobanks for future research, as these samples may be used in studies beyond their initial purpose. For pediatric studies, consent must be obtained from both the child and their legal guardians, requiring the recording of multiple consents at once. Electronic consent has become more popular recently due to its ability to prevent errors and simplify the documentation of multiple consents. However, integrating consent capture into existing study software structures remains a challenge. This report evaluates the usability of the generic Informed Consent Service (gICS) of the University Medicine Greifswald (UMG) for obtaining electronic consent in pediatric studies. The setup was designed to integrate seamlessly with the current infrastructure and meet the specific needs of a multi-user, multi-study environment. The study was conducted in a pediatric research setting, where additional informed consent was obtained separately for the biobank. Over a period of 54 weeks, 1061 children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years participated in the study. Out of these, 348 agreed also to participate in the biobank. The analysis included a total of 2066 consents and assents, with 945 paper-based and 1121 electronic consents. The study assessed the error susceptibility of electronic versus paper-based consents and found a significant reduction rate of errors of 94.7%. These findings provide valuable insights into the use of gICS in various studies and the practical implementation of electronic consent software in pediatric medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000661
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On-site electronic consent in pediatrics using generic Informed Consent Service (gICS): Creating a specialized setup and collecting consent data

Ludwig Christian Hinske, Felix C. Linhardt, Laura Mantoan Ritter, J Dittmer et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

On-site electronic consent in pediatrics using generic Informed Consent Service (gICS): Creating a specialized setup and collecting consent data

Ludwig Christian Hinske, Felix C. Linhardt, Laura Mantoan Ritter, J Dittmer, Katharina Danhauser, Larissa Mantoan, Martin Bialke, Dana Stahl, Martin Schäfer, Steve Glaser, Stephan Endres, Christoph A. Klein, Simon Leutner, B Frey, Bärbel Maag, Georgia Donata Emily Miebach, Karla Strniscak, Jenny Pfropfreis
article en

Abstract

Enrolling in a clinical trial or study requires informed consent. Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure proper consent when storing samples in biobanks for future research, as these samples may be used in studies beyond their initial purpose. For pediatric studies, consent must be obtained from both the child and their legal guardians, requiring the recording of multiple consents at once. Electronic consent has become more popular recently due to its ability to prevent errors and simplify the documentation of multiple consents. However, integrating consent capture into existing study software structures remains a challenge. This report evaluates the usability of the generic Informed Consent Service (gICS) of the University Medicine Greifswald (UMG) for obtaining electronic consent in pediatric studies. The setup was designed to integrate seamlessly with the current infrastructure and meet the specific needs of a multi-user, multi-study environment. The study was conducted in a pediatric research setting, where additional informed consent was obtained separately for the biobank. Over a period of 54 weeks, 1061 children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years participated in the study. Out of these, 348 agreed also to participate in the biobank. The analysis included a total of 2066 consents and assents, with 945 paper-based and 1121 electronic consents. The study assessed the error susceptibility of electronic versus paper-based consents and found a significant reduction rate of errors of 94.7%. These findings provide valuable insights into the use of gICS in various studies and the practical implementation of electronic consent software in pediatric medicine.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 3(11)
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.