Visualization Artifacts are Boundary Objects

Despite 30+ years of academic practice, visualization still lacks an explanation of how and why it functions in complex organizations performing knowledge work. This survey takes steps to bridge this knowledge gap by examining the intersection of organizational studies and visualization design, highlighting the concept of boundary objects, which visualization practitioners are adopting in both CSCW (computer-supported collaborative work) and HCI. This paper also collects the prior literature on boundary objects in visualization design studies, a methodology which maps closely to action research in organizations, and addresses the same problems of ‘knowing in common’. We argue that rocess artifacts generated by visualization design studies function as boundary objects in their own right, facilitating knowledge transfer across disciplines within an organization. Currently, visualization faces the challenge of ex-plaining how sense-making functions across domains, through vi-sualization artifacts, and how these support decision-making. As a deeply interdisciplinary field, we advocate that visualization should adopt the theory of boundary objects in order to embrace its plu-rality of domains and systems, whilst empowering its practitioners with a unified process-based theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/beliv64461.2024.00014
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualization Artifacts are Boundary Objects

Scott Davidoff, Jasmine Otto
3 citations
Data Visualization and Analytics
0.75
article

Visualization Artifacts are Boundary Objects

Scott Davidoff, Jasmine Otto
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite 30+ years of academic practice, visualization still lacks an explanation of how and why it functions in complex organizations performing knowledge work. This survey takes steps to bridge this knowledge gap by examining the intersection of organizational studies and visualization design, highlighting the concept of boundary objects, which visualization practitioners are adopting in both CSCW (computer-supported collaborative work) and HCI. This paper also collects the prior literature on boundary objects in visualization design studies, a methodology which maps closely to action research in organizations, and addresses the same problems of ‘knowing in common’. We argue that rocess artifacts generated by visualization design studies function as boundary objects in their own right, facilitating knowledge transfer across disciplines within an organization. Currently, visualization faces the challenge of ex-plaining how sense-making functions across domains, through vi-sualization artifacts, and how these support decision-making. As a deeply interdisciplinary field, we advocate that visualization should adopt the theory of boundary objects in order to embrace its plu-rality of domains and systems, whilst empowering its practitioners with a unified process-based theory.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Data Visualization and Analytics
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Visualization Artifacts are Boundary Objects — Scott Davidoff, Jasmine Otto · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS