Testing the Test: Observations When Assessing Visualization Literacy of Domain Experts

Various standardized tests exist that assess individuals' visualization literacy. Their use can help to draw conclusions from studies. However, it is not taken into account that the test itself can create a pressure situation where participants might fear being exposed and assessed negatively. This is especially problematic when testing domain experts in design studies. We conducted interviews with experts from different domains performing the Mini-VLAT test for visualization literacy to identify potential problems. Our participants reported that the time limit per question, ambiguities in the questions and visualizations, and missing steps in the test procedure mainly had an impact on their performance and content. We discuss possible changes to the test design to address these issues and how such assessment methods could be integrated into existing evaluation procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/beliv64461.2024.00017
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the Test: Observations When Assessing Visualization Literacy of Domain Experts

Moataz Abdelaal, Seyda Öney, Kuno Kurzhals, P. Betz et al.
2 citations
Online Learning and Analytics
0.82
article

Testing the Test: Observations When Assessing Visualization Literacy of Domain Experts

Moataz Abdelaal, Seyda Öney, Kuno Kurzhals, P. Betz, Daniel Weiskopf, Cordula Kropp
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Various standardized tests exist that assess individuals' visualization literacy. Their use can help to draw conclusions from studies. However, it is not taken into account that the test itself can create a pressure situation where participants might fear being exposed and assessed negatively. This is especially problematic when testing domain experts in design studies. We conducted interviews with experts from different domains performing the Mini-VLAT test for visualization literacy to identify potential problems. Our participants reported that the time limit per question, ambiguities in the questions and visualizations, and missing steps in the test procedure mainly had an impact on their performance and content. We discuss possible changes to the test design to address these issues and how such assessment methods could be integrated into existing evaluation procedures.

University of Stuttgart (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.