CFD Simulation and Analysis of LOHC Dehydrogenation Furnace and Reactor Configurations

The LOHC dehydrogenation furnace and reactor are simulated in the present work to produce 10 N m3/h of hydrogen. Two reactor configurations are considered for the LOHC dehydrogenation system–helical and U-tube coil configuration. The furnace model is validated by comparing model predictions with the steam-cracking furnace simulation from Habibi et al. (Impact of Radiation Models in CFD Simulations of Steam Cracking Furnaces. Comput Chem Eng 2007, 31 (11), 1389–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.11.009.). The flue gas temperature distribution, velocity, heat flux, and wall temperature within the furnace are determined by solving the mass, momentum, and energy equations through simulations conducted in Ansys Fluent software. The wall temperature obtained from the CFD simulation is used as an input for the 1D model of the dehydrogenation reactor to obtain the process side temperature and perhydro dibenzyltoluene (PDBT) conversion along the reactor length for both configurations. The reactor is designed to achieve more than 99% conversion of perhydro dibenzyl toluene. The wall temperature along the reactor length varies linearly from 660 to 807 K for the helical coil configuration, whereas the wall temperature for the U-tube configuration varies sinusoidally along the reactor length between 670 and 817 K. Additionally, the high wall temperature reduces the length required for the helical and U-tube coil configurations to achieve 99% conversion, compared to the constant wall temperature conditions reported in previous literature (Rao et al., Optimization of Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) Dehydrogenation System. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (66), 28530–28547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.197). The helical coil configuration also demonstrates slightly higher thermal efficiency across various conversions compared to the U-tube configuration, offering valuable insights for designing efficient LOHC dehydrogenation systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03173
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CFD Simulation and Analysis of LOHC Dehydrogenation Furnace and Reactor Configurations

Nihal Rao, Ashwin W. Patwardhan
2 citations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
0.37
article

CFD Simulation and Analysis of LOHC Dehydrogenation Furnace and Reactor Configurations

Nihal Rao, Ashwin W. Patwardhan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The LOHC dehydrogenation furnace and reactor are simulated in the present work to produce 10 N m3/h of hydrogen. Two reactor configurations are considered for the LOHC dehydrogenation system–helical and U-tube coil configuration. The furnace model is validated by comparing model predictions with the steam-cracking furnace simulation from Habibi et al. (Impact of Radiation Models in CFD Simulations of Steam Cracking Furnaces. Comput Chem Eng 2007, 31 (11), 1389–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.11.009.). The flue gas temperature distribution, velocity, heat flux, and wall temperature within the furnace are determined by solving the mass, momentum, and energy equations through simulations conducted in Ansys Fluent software. The wall temperature obtained from the CFD simulation is used as an input for the 1D model of the dehydrogenation reactor to obtain the process side temperature and perhydro dibenzyltoluene (PDBT) conversion along the reactor length for both configurations. The reactor is designed to achieve more than 99% conversion of perhydro dibenzyl toluene. The wall temperature along the reactor length varies linearly from 660 to 807 K for the helical coil configuration, whereas the wall temperature for the U-tube configuration varies sinusoidally along the reactor length between 670 and 817 K. Additionally, the high wall temperature reduces the length required for the helical and U-tube coil configurations to achieve 99% conversion, compared to the constant wall temperature conditions reported in previous literature (Rao et al., Optimization of Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) Dehydrogenation System. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (66), 28530–28547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.197). The helical coil configuration also demonstrates slightly higher thermal efficiency across various conversions compared to the U-tube configuration, offering valuable insights for designing efficient LOHC dehydrogenation systems.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 63(49)
University of Mumbai (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.