The non-emergency economic policy competence in Article 122(1) TFEU

The Next Generation EU (NGEU) programme has sparked a major constitutional debate in EU law, with assessments ranging from approving NGEU as creative legal engineering to repudiating it as breaching EU primary law.A third approach aims to transcend the first two by qualifying NGEU as a “constitutional moment” for the EU. What most of these assessments nonetheless have in common is that they – implicitly or explicitly – qualify Article 122(1)TFEU as an emergency legal basis. This contribution challenges the idea that Article 122(1) TFEU exclusively contains an emergency legal basis and provides a textual, systemic, historic and teleological reading of that legal basis in support. While reading Article 122(1)TFEU as such would both do away with most of the constitutional objections against NGEU and allow the EU to develop its own dedicated economic policy, complementing its coordination of the Member States’ national economic policies, a risk also arises of that legal basis conferring an unchecked executive power on the Council.To counter that risk, this contribution further identifies useful safeguards, ensuring that the vertical and horizontal balances of power within the EU construct remain intact.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Common Market Law Review
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2024100
Citations
19
Primary Topic
EU Law and Policy Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
77.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The non-emergency economic policy competence in Article 122(1) TFEU

Merijn Chamon
19 citations
Common Market Law Review
EU Law and Policy Analysis
77.41
article

The non-emergency economic policy competence in Article 122(1) TFEU

Merijn Chamon
article en
19 citations

Abstract

The Next Generation EU (NGEU) programme has sparked a major constitutional debate in EU law, with assessments ranging from approving NGEU as creative legal engineering to repudiating it as breaching EU primary law.A third approach aims to transcend the first two by qualifying NGEU as a “constitutional moment” for the EU. What most of these assessments nonetheless have in common is that they – implicitly or explicitly – qualify Article 122(1)TFEU as an emergency legal basis. This contribution challenges the idea that Article 122(1) TFEU exclusively contains an emergency legal basis and provides a textual, systemic, historic and teleological reading of that legal basis in support. While reading Article 122(1)TFEU as such would both do away with most of the constitutional objections against NGEU and allow the EU to develop its own dedicated economic policy, complementing its coordination of the Member States’ national economic policies, a risk also arises of that legal basis conferring an unchecked executive power on the Council.To counter that risk, this contribution further identifies useful safeguards, ensuring that the vertical and horizontal balances of power within the EU construct remain intact.

Common Market Law ReviewVol. 61(Issue 6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
EU Law and Policy Analysis
77.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.