Phenotypes and Trajectories of Tobacco-Exposed Persons with Preserved Spirometry: Insights from Lung Volumes

<b>Rationale:</b> Among tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry (TEPSs), we previously demonstrated that different lung volume indices-specifically, elevated total lung capacity (TLC) versus elevated ratio of functional residual capacity to TLC (FRC/TLC)-identify different lung disease characteristics in the COPDGene cohort. <b>Objective:</b> We sought to determine differential disease characteristics and trajectories associated with lung volume indices among TEPSs in the SPIROMICS cohort. <b>Methods:</b> We categorized TEPSs (<i>n</i> = 814) by tertiles (low, intermediate, and high) of TLC or residual volume-to-TLC ratio (RV/TLC) derived from baseline computed tomography images and then examined clinical and spirometric disease trajectories in mutually exclusive categories of participants with high TLC without high RV/TLC ([TLC]<sup>high</sup>) versus high RV/TLC without high TLC ([RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup>). We examined differences in computed tomography-measured emphysema (Hounsfield units [HU] ⩽-950; parametric response mapping [PRM] of emphysema), air trapping (HU⩽-856; PRM of functional small airway disease; a disease probability measure for non-emphysematous gas trapping), airway geometry (the mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale; COPD Assessment Test [CAT]; St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]; and Short Form-12 [SF12]), and outcomes (annualized exacerbation rate) between the two categories at baseline and over follow-up time up to 8.5 years, using regression modeling adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, and smoking status (current vs. former smoker) and burden (pack-years). <b>Results:</b> In TEPSs, the pattern of spirometric disease progression differed between participants with [TLC]<sup>high</sup> and those with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup>: There was increased forced vital capacity with stable forced expiratory volume in 1 second in participants with [TLC]<sup>high</sup>, versus unchanged forced vital capacity but nominally decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second in those with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup>. Compared with participants with [TLC]<sup>high</sup>, TEPSs with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup> had less emphysema (by HU ⩽-950) but more airway disease (by HU ⩽-856; PRM of functional small airway disease; disease probability measure for gas trapping, and mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), more respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, CAT, SGRQ, and SF12), and more severe exacerbations at baseline. Over an average follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.4 years (range = 0.5-8.5 yr), TEPSs with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup> also had a higher likelihood of developing more severe spirometric disease (preserved ratio impaired spirometry or Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Classification 2) and worsening of their respiratory symptoms (on the CAT and SGRQ). Although the incidence rates of respiratory exacerbations, hospitalizations, and mortality were not significantly different between the two categories over the follow-up period, TEPSs with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup> were more likely to have been prescribed a respiratory inhaler at their last follow-up visit. <b>Conclusions:</b> In these TEPSs from the SPIROMICS cohort, lung volume stratification by TLC versus RV/TLC identifies two pre-COPD phenotypes with distinct respiratory symptoms, radiographic features, and clinical trajectories. The characteristics of these pre-COPD phenotypes match those previously described in the COPDGene cohort using TLC versus FRC/TLC stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202405-527oc
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenotypes and Trajectories of Tobacco-Exposed Persons with Preserved Spirometry: Insights from Lung Volumes

Nadia N. Hansel, Siyang Zeng, Gerard J. Criner, Eric A. Hoffman et al.
4 citations
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
1.68
article

Phenotypes and Trajectories of Tobacco-Exposed Persons with Preserved Spirometry: Insights from Lung Volumes

Nadia N. Hansel, Siyang Zeng, Gerard J. Criner, Eric A. Hoffman, Russell Paul Bowler, Igor Barjaktarević, MeiLan K. Han, Richard E. Kanner, Wassim W. Labaki, Spyridon Fortis, Victor E. Ortega, Mark T. Dransfield, Stephen P. Peters, Mehrdad Arjomandi, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Jerry A. Krishnan, Prescott G. Woodruff, Alejandro P. Comellas, Stephen I. Rennard, Michael Drummond, Robert Paine, David Couper, Eugene R. Bleecker, Robert J. Kaner, Donald P. Tashkin, Christopher B. Cooper
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Among tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry (TEPSs), we previously demonstrated that different lung volume indices-specifically, elevated total lung capacity (TLC) versus elevated ratio of functional residual capacity to TLC (FRC/TLC)-identify different lung disease characteristics in the COPDGene cohort. <b>Objective:</b> We sought to determine differential disease characteristics and trajectories associated with lung volume indices among TEPSs in the SPIROMICS cohort. <b>Methods:</b> We categorized TEPSs (<i>n</i> = 814) by tertiles (low, intermediate, and high) of TLC or residual volume-to-TLC ratio (RV/TLC) derived from baseline computed tomography images and then examined clinical and spirometric disease trajectories in mutually exclusive categories of participants with high TLC without high RV/TLC ([TLC]<sup>high</sup>) versus high RV/TLC without high TLC ([RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup>). We examined differences in computed tomography-measured emphysema (Hounsfield units [HU] ⩽-950; parametric response mapping [PRM] of emphysema), air trapping (HU⩽-856; PRM of functional small airway disease; a disease probability measure for non-emphysematous gas trapping), airway geometry (the mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale; COPD Assessment Test [CAT]; St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]; and Short Form-12 [SF12]), and outcomes (annualized exacerbation rate) between the two categories at baseline and over follow-up time up to 8.5 years, using regression modeling adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, and smoking status (current vs. former smoker) and burden (pack-years). <b>Results:</b> In TEPSs, the pattern of spirometric disease progression differed between participants with [TLC]<sup>high</sup> and those with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup>: There was increased forced vital capacity with stable forced expiratory volume in 1 second in participants with [TLC]<sup>high</sup>, versus unchanged forced vital capacity but nominally decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second in those with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup>. Compared with participants with [TLC]<sup>high</sup>, TEPSs with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup> had less emphysema (by HU ⩽-950) but more airway disease (by HU ⩽-856; PRM of functional small airway disease; disease probability measure for gas trapping, and mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), more respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, CAT, SGRQ, and SF12), and more severe exacerbations at baseline. Over an average follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.4 years (range = 0.5-8.5 yr), TEPSs with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup> also had a higher likelihood of developing more severe spirometric disease (preserved ratio impaired spirometry or Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Classification 2) and worsening of their respiratory symptoms (on the CAT and SGRQ). Although the incidence rates of respiratory exacerbations, hospitalizations, and mortality were not significantly different between the two categories over the follow-up period, TEPSs with [RV/TLC]<sup>high</sup> were more likely to have been prescribed a respiratory inhaler at their last follow-up visit. <b>Conclusions:</b> In these TEPSs from the SPIROMICS cohort, lung volume stratification by TLC versus RV/TLC identifies two pre-COPD phenotypes with distinct respiratory symptoms, radiographic features, and clinical trajectories. The characteristics of these pre-COPD phenotypes match those previously described in the COPDGene cohort using TLC versus FRC/TLC stratification.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of Iowa (US), San Francisco VA Medical Center (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Washington Medical Center (US), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (US), University of California System (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), Michigan United (US), A. Alfred Taubman Health Care Center (US), Michigan Medicine (US), Birmingham VA Medical Center (US), Temple University Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates (US), Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US), Temple University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.