Assessing Volumetric Energy Density as a Predictor of Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion 316L Stainless Steel

Abstract Minimizing porosity is a common challenge in powder bed fusion-laser bed (PBF-LB), so predictive modeling to enable parameter selection free of porosity is of great value. Porosity formation may occur through several mechanisms, include keyholing and lack of fusion. Volumetric energy density is often used in the literature to predict defect formation. However, volumetric energy density does not account for the various mechanisms by which porosity forms. In this work, nine LPBF parameter sets spanning variation in laser power, scanning velocity, and hatch spacing, all with the same volumetric energy density, are evaluated with 316L stainless steel. It was found that there are systematic variations in the type and amount of pores between these parameter sets that have the same volumetric density. We show that defect maps comprised of analytical models for defect formation can predict parameter sets with minimal porosity. A modified interpass lack-of-fusion (LOF) porosity criteria and a new spatter-induced intrapass LOF criteria are proposed to improve predictions at low laser powers and scanning velocities, and at high laser powers and scanning velocities, respectively. The results of this work are expected to help accelerate parameter selection for laser powder bed fusion 316L with minimal porosity defects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOM
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06946-z
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Volumetric Energy Density as a Predictor of Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion 316L Stainless Steel

Garrison Hommer, Craig Brice, Kip O. Findley, Jonah Klemm-Toole et al.
20 citations
JOM
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
4.25
article

Assessing Volumetric Energy Density as a Predictor of Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion 316L Stainless Steel

Garrison Hommer, Craig Brice, Kip O. Findley, Jonah Klemm-Toole, Joy Gockel, Chris Smith, Amy J. Clarke, M. Keeler
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Abstract Minimizing porosity is a common challenge in powder bed fusion-laser bed (PBF-LB), so predictive modeling to enable parameter selection free of porosity is of great value. Porosity formation may occur through several mechanisms, include keyholing and lack of fusion. Volumetric energy density is often used in the literature to predict defect formation. However, volumetric energy density does not account for the various mechanisms by which porosity forms. In this work, nine LPBF parameter sets spanning variation in laser power, scanning velocity, and hatch spacing, all with the same volumetric energy density, are evaluated with 316L stainless steel. It was found that there are systematic variations in the type and amount of pores between these parameter sets that have the same volumetric density. We show that defect maps comprised of analytical models for defect formation can predict parameter sets with minimal porosity. A modified interpass lack-of-fusion (LOF) porosity criteria and a new spatter-induced intrapass LOF criteria are proposed to improve predictions at low laser powers and scanning velocities, and at high laser powers and scanning velocities, respectively. The results of this work are expected to help accelerate parameter selection for laser powder bed fusion 316L with minimal porosity defects.

JOMVol. 77(2)
Colorado School of Mines (US)
National Science Foundation, CCDC Ground Vehicle Systems Center, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Materials Research
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.