Framing matters: LGBTQIA+ organisations’ boundary spanning within and across collective action fields

Western-based LGBTQIA+ mobilisations have often been described as both internally fragmented and isolated from other social struggles. However, recent studies show that LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*, queer, intersex, asexual/aromantic and other) organisations have increasingly used social media to span organisational boundaries by networking with other groups and framing common concerns. This article addresses these concerns by examining the interplay between digital networking and collective framing in different socio-political contexts and over time. The investigation focuses on the collective action events promoted on Facebook by LGBTQIA+ organisations located in Milan and Madrid between 2011 and 2020. After mapping the socio-semantic networks resulting from the promotion of the collective action events, the article analyses the brokerage roles played by different frames. Our findings show that while social media facilitates the creation of both within- and cross-field cooperative networks, framing congruence is necessary for transforming occasional cross-field network choices into sustained efforts to span boundaries and form intersectional alliances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2024d000000063
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sociology and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing matters: LGBTQIA+ organisations’ boundary spanning within and across collective action fields

Aurora Perego, Elena Pavan
1 citations
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Sociology and Education Studies
1.13
article

Framing matters: LGBTQIA+ organisations’ boundary spanning within and across collective action fields

Aurora Perego, Elena Pavan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Western-based LGBTQIA+ mobilisations have often been described as both internally fragmented and isolated from other social struggles. However, recent studies show that LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*, queer, intersex, asexual/aromantic and other) organisations have increasingly used social media to span organisational boundaries by networking with other groups and framing common concerns. This article addresses these concerns by examining the interplay between digital networking and collective framing in different socio-political contexts and over time. The investigation focuses on the collective action events promoted on Facebook by LGBTQIA+ organisations located in Milan and Madrid between 2011 and 2020. After mapping the socio-semantic networks resulting from the promotion of the collective action events, the article analyses the brokerage roles played by different frames. Our findings show that while social media facilitates the creation of both within- and cross-field cooperative networks, framing congruence is necessary for transforming occasional cross-field network choices into sustained efforts to span boundaries and form intersectional alliances.

European Journal of Politics and GenderVol. 8(2)
University of Trento (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sociology and Education Studies
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Framing matters: LGBTQIA+ organisations’ boundary spanning within and across collective action fields — Aurora Perego, Elena Pavan · European Journal of Politics and Gender (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS