Bank Lending and Policy Interactions—A Comprehensive Assessment for the <scp>G20</scp> Countries

ABSTRACT This study examines the joint impact from supervisory requirements, monetary policies and rescue packages on the supply of bank loans. Evidence is obtained from conceptual considerations and the empirical investigation of G20 banks over the period 1995–2021. To prepare the analysis of interactions, we first address modelling concepts and consistently identify the effects on bank lending that come from each of the regulatory approaches in isolation. Second, we empirically assess the effects that result from the parallel application of policy actions. Short‐term liquidity ratios in combination with further variables mostly associate with positive interaction effects. In contrast, the joint assessment of long‐term liquidity ratios as well as leverage ratios with other policy actions usually provides negative effects. Overall, the results suggest that unconventional monetary policy and rescue actions can stimulate bank lending only after the institutions have restored their own stability. Interactions of policy actions matter, and both regulatory authorities and bank management should consider them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3075
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bank Lending and Policy Interactions—A Comprehensive Assessment for the G20 Countries

Dieter Gramlich, Dalu Zhang, Meilan Yan
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Bank Lending and Policy Interactions—A Comprehensive Assessment for the G20 Countries

Dieter Gramlich, Dalu Zhang, Meilan Yan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the joint impact from supervisory requirements, monetary policies and rescue packages on the supply of bank loans. Evidence is obtained from conceptual considerations and the empirical investigation of G20 banks over the period 1995–2021. To prepare the analysis of interactions, we first address modelling concepts and consistently identify the effects on bank lending that come from each of the regulatory approaches in isolation. Second, we empirically assess the effects that result from the parallel application of policy actions. Short‐term liquidity ratios in combination with further variables mostly associate with positive interaction effects. In contrast, the joint assessment of long‐term liquidity ratios as well as leverage ratios with other policy actions usually provides negative effects. Overall, the results suggest that unconventional monetary policy and rescue actions can stimulate bank lending only after the institutions have restored their own stability. Interactions of policy actions matter, and both regulatory authorities and bank management should consider them.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DE), Loughborough University (GB), University of Leicester (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.