New tools for studying planarity in galaxy satellite systems: Milky Way satellite planes are consistent with ΛCDM

ABSTRACT We introduce a new concept – termed ‘planarity’ – which aims to quantify planar structure in galaxy satellite systems without recourse to the number or thickness of planes. We use positions and velocities from the Gaia EDR3 to measure planarity in Milky Way (MW) satellites and the extent to which planes within the MW system are kinematically supported. We show that the position vectors of the MW satellites exhibit strong planarity but the velocity vectors do not, and that kinematic coherence cannot, therefore, be confirmed from current observational data. We then apply our methodology to NewHorizon, a high-resolution cosmological simulation, to compare satellite planarity in MW-like galaxies in a Lambda cold dark matter ($\rm {\Lambda CDM}$)-based model to that in the MW satellite data. We demonstrate that kinematically supported planes are common in the simulation and that the observed planarity of MW satellites is not in tension with the standard $\rm {\Lambda CDM}$ paradigm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2632
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New tools for studying planarity in galaxy satellite systems: Milky Way satellite planes are consistent with ΛCDM

Joseph Silk, Julien Devriendt, Christophe Pichon, Sugata Kaviraj et al.
6 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
3.04
article

New tools for studying planarity in galaxy satellite systems: Milky Way satellite planes are consistent with ΛCDM

Joseph Silk, Julien Devriendt, Christophe Pichon, Sugata Kaviraj, Sébastien Peirani, Sukyoung K. Yi, Emir Uzeirbegovic, R. A. JACKSON, Yohan Dubois, Katarina Kraljic, Garreth Martin
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We introduce a new concept – termed ‘planarity’ – which aims to quantify planar structure in galaxy satellite systems without recourse to the number or thickness of planes. We use positions and velocities from the Gaia EDR3 to measure planarity in Milky Way (MW) satellites and the extent to which planes within the MW system are kinematically supported. We show that the position vectors of the MW satellites exhibit strong planarity but the velocity vectors do not, and that kinematic coherence cannot, therefore, be confirmed from current observational data. We then apply our methodology to NewHorizon, a high-resolution cosmological simulation, to compare satellite planarity in MW-like galaxies in a Lambda cold dark matter ($\rm {\Lambda CDM}$)-based model to that in the MW satellite data. We demonstrate that kinematically supported planes are common in the simulation and that the observed planarity of MW satellites is not in tension with the standard $\rm {\Lambda CDM}$ paradigm.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 535(4)
Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Hertfordshire (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), Johns Hopkins University (US), Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (JP), Yonsei University (KR), University of Victoria (CA), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), University of Oxford (GB), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), University of Baltimore (US), The University of Tokyo (JP)
National Science Foundation, European Space Agency, University of Hertfordshire, National Research Foundation, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif, Korea Research Environment Open Network, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.