The Comedy of Measurement Errors: Standard Error of Measurement and Standard Error of Estimation

Testing is used to inform a range of critical decisions that help structure much of contemporary society. An unavoidable aspect of testing is that test scores are not infallible. As a result, individual test scores should be accompanied by an interval that indicates the uncertainty surrounding the score. There are a number of different test-score intervals that can be created from different error terms. Unfortunately, there are pervasive misinterpretations of these errors and their intervals. Many of these interpretations can be found in authoritative sources on psychological measurement, which has resulted in stubborn and persistent confusion about what these intervals mean. In the current article, we clarify two important error terms and their intervals: (a) the Standard Error of Estimation and (b) the Standard Error of Measurement. We explicate the meaning and interpretation of these errors by examining their statistical foundations. Specifically, we detail how these terms are formulated from different statistical models and the implications of these models for their different interpretations. We use classical test theory, bivariate linear regression, R activities, and algebra to illustrate the key concepts and differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241285885
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Comedy of Measurement Errors: Standard Error of Measurement and Standard Error of Estimation

Jeffrey S. Spence, David T. Stanley
4 citations
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
2.29
article

The Comedy of Measurement Errors: Standard Error of Measurement and Standard Error of Estimation

Jeffrey S. Spence, David T. Stanley
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Testing is used to inform a range of critical decisions that help structure much of contemporary society. An unavoidable aspect of testing is that test scores are not infallible. As a result, individual test scores should be accompanied by an interval that indicates the uncertainty surrounding the score. There are a number of different test-score intervals that can be created from different error terms. Unfortunately, there are pervasive misinterpretations of these errors and their intervals. Many of these interpretations can be found in authoritative sources on psychological measurement, which has resulted in stubborn and persistent confusion about what these intervals mean. In the current article, we clarify two important error terms and their intervals: (a) the Standard Error of Estimation and (b) the Standard Error of Measurement. We explicate the meaning and interpretation of these errors by examining their statistical foundations. Specifically, we detail how these terms are formulated from different statistical models and the implications of these models for their different interpretations. We use classical test theory, bivariate linear regression, R activities, and algebra to illustrate the key concepts and differences.

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological ScienceVol. 7(4)
University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Comedy of Measurement Errors: Standard Error of Measurement and Standard Error of Estimation — Jeffrey S. Spence, David T. Stanley · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS