Performance of Amine-based Post-combustion CO2 Capture:Comparison of MEA and EDA

This study investigates the CO<sub>2</sub> capture performance of various amine-based solvents, focusing on ethylenediamine (EDA) as a potential alternative to the widely used monoethanolamine (MEA) in post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Experiments were conducted to evaluate CO<sub>2</sub> capture capacities and removal efficiencies under different conditions, including solvent concentrations and feed flow rates, in both batch and continuous absorption-regeneration processes. The results show that EDA demonstrates significantly higher CO<sub>2</sub> capture capacity and removal efficiency compared to MEA, with reduced energy consumption due to lower regeneration temperature. These findings suggest that EDA is a promising candidate for improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of CO<sub>2</sub> capture in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Society for Environmental Technology
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26511/jkset.25.5.1
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Amine-based Post-combustion CO2 Capture:Comparison of MEA and EDA

Choon‐Ki Na, Xiangyu Li
1 links
Journal of the Korean Society for Environmental Technology
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Performance of Amine-based Post-combustion CO2 Capture:Comparison of MEA and EDA

Choon‐Ki Na, Xiangyu Li
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the CO<sub>2</sub> capture performance of various amine-based solvents, focusing on ethylenediamine (EDA) as a potential alternative to the widely used monoethanolamine (MEA) in post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Experiments were conducted to evaluate CO<sub>2</sub> capture capacities and removal efficiencies under different conditions, including solvent concentrations and feed flow rates, in both batch and continuous absorption-regeneration processes. The results show that EDA demonstrates significantly higher CO<sub>2</sub> capture capacity and removal efficiency compared to MEA, with reduced energy consumption due to lower regeneration temperature. These findings suggest that EDA is a promising candidate for improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of CO<sub>2</sub> capture in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology.

Journal of the Korean Society for Environmental TechnologyVol. 25(5)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance of Amine-based Post-combustion CO2 Capture:Comparison of MEA and EDA — Choon‐Ki Na, Xiangyu Li · Journal of the Korean Society for Environmental Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS