How Much Does the Business Development of Circular Eco‐Efficient Practices Improve by Shaking Stakeholders up?

ABSTRACT European firms are currently in a process of transition toward a circular economy, which is expected to guarantee sustainable growth over time. Developing eco‐efficient practices is a necessary step in this transition. This study analyzes the impact of stakeholder engagement in a circular business ecosystem on the development of these circular eco‐efficient practices. Past literature has evidenced the impact of stakeholder environmental pressure on firm strategic decisions and outcomes. We adopt the stakeholder theory from a more recent vision, arguing that “shaking stakeholders up” within a circular ecosystem is a more advanced strategy than the traditional approach of reacting to stakeholder pressure. Using structural equation modeling, we examine the data of 14,726 European firms and their relationships with five primary stakeholder groups. The results offer theoretical and empirical support for the idea that firms can go further in adopting eco‐efficient circular practices by shaking stakeholders up, selecting them, and managing relationships with them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12768
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Much Does the Business Development of Circular Eco‐Efficient Practices Improve by Shaking Stakeholders up?

Concepción Garcés‐Ayerbe, Pilar Rivera Torres, Aurore Darmandieu
1 citations
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
0.55
article

How Much Does the Business Development of Circular Eco‐Efficient Practices Improve by Shaking Stakeholders up?

Concepción Garcés‐Ayerbe, Pilar Rivera Torres, Aurore Darmandieu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT European firms are currently in a process of transition toward a circular economy, which is expected to guarantee sustainable growth over time. Developing eco‐efficient practices is a necessary step in this transition. This study analyzes the impact of stakeholder engagement in a circular business ecosystem on the development of these circular eco‐efficient practices. Past literature has evidenced the impact of stakeholder environmental pressure on firm strategic decisions and outcomes. We adopt the stakeholder theory from a more recent vision, arguing that “shaking stakeholders up” within a circular ecosystem is a more advanced strategy than the traditional approach of reacting to stakeholder pressure. Using structural equation modeling, we examine the data of 14,726 European firms and their relationships with five primary stakeholder groups. The results offer theoretical and empirical support for the idea that firms can go further in adopting eco‐efficient circular practices by shaking stakeholders up, selecting them, and managing relationships with them.

Business Ethics the Environment & ResponsibilityVol. 34(4)
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (FR), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
European Commission, Gobierno de Aragón, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Much Does the Business Development of Circular Eco‐Efficient Practices Improve by Shaking Stakeholders up? — Concepción Garcés‐Ayerbe, Pilar Rivera Torres, et al. · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS