ESG Investing: Evaluating the Financial Performance of Sustainable Portfolios

This research examines the financial performance of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) portfolios compared to traditional non-ESG portfolios, focusing on their returns, volatility, and risk management. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing a literature review and analysis of historical data from ESG reports and financial databases, particularly the FTSE4Good Index. The findings indicate that ESG portfolios significantly outperform traditional investments, with an average annual return exceeding conventional portfolios by approximately 4.3%. Additionally, ESG portfolios exhibit lower volatility and reduced drawdowns during market downturns, demonstrating their resilience and risk mitigation capabilities. The research concludes that investing in companies with high ESG ratings not only aligns with ethical standards but also enhances long-term financial performance. These insights underscore the growing relevance of sustainable investing in contemporary financial markets. Investors are encouraged to integrate ESG criteria into their strategies while remaining vigilant about potential challenges, such as greenwashing and variability in ESG ratings. Future research should address existing gaps in understanding the long-term impacts of ESG investing across different sectors and regions to further validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equator Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship (EJME)
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26418/ejme.v12i4.82793
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG Investing: Evaluating the Financial Performance of Sustainable Portfolios

Dini Ayu Pramitasari
Equator Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship (EJME)
Community Development and Social Impact
article

ESG Investing: Evaluating the Financial Performance of Sustainable Portfolios

Dini Ayu Pramitasari
article en

Abstract

This research examines the financial performance of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) portfolios compared to traditional non-ESG portfolios, focusing on their returns, volatility, and risk management. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing a literature review and analysis of historical data from ESG reports and financial databases, particularly the FTSE4Good Index. The findings indicate that ESG portfolios significantly outperform traditional investments, with an average annual return exceeding conventional portfolios by approximately 4.3%. Additionally, ESG portfolios exhibit lower volatility and reduced drawdowns during market downturns, demonstrating their resilience and risk mitigation capabilities. The research concludes that investing in companies with high ESG ratings not only aligns with ethical standards but also enhances long-term financial performance. These insights underscore the growing relevance of sustainable investing in contemporary financial markets. Investors are encouraged to integrate ESG criteria into their strategies while remaining vigilant about potential challenges, such as greenwashing and variability in ESG ratings. Future research should address existing gaps in understanding the long-term impacts of ESG investing across different sectors and regions to further validate these findings.

Equator Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship (EJME)Vol. 12(4)
Universitas Gresik (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.