Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research

In this article, we investigate how speakers can be categorised based on their language background in the field of Learner Corpus Research (LCR). Specifically, we discuss three key aspects: first, the theoretical assumptions and methodological choices made in learner corpus design, second the integration of a holistic perspective for speaker categorisation in LCR and third the consequences that different categorisations might have on study outcomes. Through a comprehensive review of corpora used in the field, we identify the most common terms, definitions and criteria of categorisation used to describe a speaker's language background. Focusing on the most central metadata encoding language backgrounds, the L1 metadata, we inspect different operationalisations made and scrutinise the theoretical assumptions underlying them. Drawing on research on plurilingualism, we propose a holistic view of speaker's language background for Learner Corpus Research, combining various aspects of speaker's language use by methods inspired from the Dominant Language Constellation framework. We apply this methodology to re-evaluate the language categorisation system in LEONIDE, a multilingual corpus of Italian, German and English texts from secondary school students of diverse language backgrounds. We use the same corpus to evaluate the consequences of using different categorisations of the students on the outcome of possible linguistic studies. Despite a generally high overlap between study results across categorisations, we observe that variables combining multiple aspects of the speakers’ language backgrounds seem to explain group differences for more of the linguistic features investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100170
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research

Jennifer-Carmen Frey, Aivars Glaznieks, Arianna Bienati, Stefania Spina et al.
3 citations
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
2.37
article

Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research

Jennifer-Carmen Frey, Aivars Glaznieks, Arianna Bienati, Stefania Spina, Olga Lopopolo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this article, we investigate how speakers can be categorised based on their language background in the field of Learner Corpus Research (LCR). Specifically, we discuss three key aspects: first, the theoretical assumptions and methodological choices made in learner corpus design, second the integration of a holistic perspective for speaker categorisation in LCR and third the consequences that different categorisations might have on study outcomes. Through a comprehensive review of corpora used in the field, we identify the most common terms, definitions and criteria of categorisation used to describe a speaker's language background. Focusing on the most central metadata encoding language backgrounds, the L1 metadata, we inspect different operationalisations made and scrutinise the theoretical assumptions underlying them. Drawing on research on plurilingualism, we propose a holistic view of speaker's language background for Learner Corpus Research, combining various aspects of speaker's language use by methods inspired from the Dominant Language Constellation framework. We apply this methodology to re-evaluate the language categorisation system in LEONIDE, a multilingual corpus of Italian, German and English texts from secondary school students of diverse language backgrounds. We use the same corpus to evaluate the consequences of using different categorisations of the students on the outcome of possible linguistic studies. Despite a generally high overlap between study results across categorisations, we observe that variables combining multiple aspects of the speakers’ language backgrounds seem to explain group differences for more of the linguistic features investigated.

Research Methods in Applied LinguisticsVol. 4(1)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Eurac Research (IT), University of Perugia (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.