Forum: Fostering Cooperation in Conflict Research Beyond Borders

In this forum article, we examine the state of the field of Peace and Conflict Studies in providing a platform to incorporate local knowledge to generate global insights. Many scholars in peace and conflict studies have traditionally relied on cross-national empirical analyses to investigate conflict dynamics, which can present opportunities for increased level of collaboration, methodological advancement, and interdisciplinary works. Whereas Western-oriented institutions and approaches serve as the locomotive of the production in the field, the vast majority of their data locates in non-Western contexts with diverse cultural, political, social, linguistic, and economic settings. Hence, the overarching theme of this forum emphasizes the benefits of an empirically-driven, methodologically rigorous research agenda that strongly incorporates local knowledge. We offer a platform to discuss the limits and prospects of Global North- South cooperation, the challenges of gathering dependable data, and the ways to overcome these issues while maintaining academic integrity and deepening our understanding of conflict dynamics. We believe that sustained investment in collaborative partnerships and capacity-building initiatives will be critical for unlocking the full potential of local expertise and insights in advancing knowledge-production and fostering peace and stability in conflict-affected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
All Azimuth A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1590826
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forum: Fostering Cooperation in Conflict Research Beyond Borders

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, İlker Kalın, David B. Carter, Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham et al.
2 citations
All Azimuth A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace
Peacebuilding and International Security
2.26
article

Forum: Fostering Cooperation in Conflict Research Beyond Borders

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, İlker Kalın, David B. Carter, Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham, Deniz Aksoy, Cyanne E. Loyle, Seden Akcinaroglu, Efe Tokdemir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this forum article, we examine the state of the field of Peace and Conflict Studies in providing a platform to incorporate local knowledge to generate global insights. Many scholars in peace and conflict studies have traditionally relied on cross-national empirical analyses to investigate conflict dynamics, which can present opportunities for increased level of collaboration, methodological advancement, and interdisciplinary works. Whereas Western-oriented institutions and approaches serve as the locomotive of the production in the field, the vast majority of their data locates in non-Western contexts with diverse cultural, political, social, linguistic, and economic settings. Hence, the overarching theme of this forum emphasizes the benefits of an empirically-driven, methodologically rigorous research agenda that strongly incorporates local knowledge. We offer a platform to discuss the limits and prospects of Global North- South cooperation, the challenges of gathering dependable data, and the ways to overcome these issues while maintaining academic integrity and deepening our understanding of conflict dynamics. We believe that sustained investment in collaborative partnerships and capacity-building initiatives will be critical for unlocking the full potential of local expertise and insights in advancing knowledge-production and fostering peace and stability in conflict-affected areas.

All Azimuth A Journal of Foreign Policy and PeaceVol. 14(2)
University of Essex (GB), Binghamton University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Bilkent University (TR), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Foundation Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Peacebuilding and International Security
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.